Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Bolts, 288 N.W.2d 718.
- State v. Ness 707 N.W.2d 676 Minn. 2006
- State v. Lynch 590 N.W.2d 75 Minn. 1999
-
State v. Lynch
590 N.W.2d 75
Minn. 1999
This court has “been *81 flexible in applying this ‘test’ on appeal, upholding admission notwithstanding a lack of closeness in time or place if the relevance of the evidence was otherwise clear.” DeBaere, d at 305 ( State v. Bellcourt, 312 Minn. 263 , ).
- State v. Kennedy 585 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1998
-
State v. Kennedy
585 N.W.2d 385
Minn. 1998
( State v. Bellcourt, 312 Minn. 263 , ).
- State v. Norris 428 N.W.2d 61 Minn. 1988
- State v. Norris 428 N.W.2d 61 Minn. 1988
- State v. Flores 418 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 1988
- State v. Flores 418 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 1988
- State v. Champion 413 N.W.2d 161 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Champion 413 N.W.2d 161 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Rainer 411 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1987
- State v. Rainer 411 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1987
- State v. Perez 397 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
State v. Perez
397 N.W.2d 916
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(gap of one and one-half years weighs against admissibility).
- State v. Rothering 397 N.W.2d 346 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
State v. Rothering
397 N.W.2d 346
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In addition, it must rule that the probative value of the evidence outweighs any potential for “unfair prejudice.”
- State v. Jones 392 N.W.2d 224 Minn. 1986
-
State v. Jones
392 N.W.2d 224
Minn. 1986
(trial courts must determine that the evidence is “relevant and material to the state’s case”); (before admitting such evidence trial courts must rule that the probative value of the evidence outweighs any potential for “unfair prejudice”); State v. Billstrom, 276 Minn. 174, 179 , (there must be “clear and convincing evidence” that the defendant participated in the cri
- State v. Doughman 384 N.W.2d 450 Minn. 1986
-
State v. Doughman
384 N.W.2d 450
Minn. 1986
In addition, it must rule that the probative value of the evidence outweighs any potential for “unfair prejudice.”
- State v. DeBaere 356 N.W.2d 301 Minn. 1984
-
State v. DeBaere
356 N.W.2d 301
Minn. 1984
See, e.g., State v. Matteson, supra; State v. Bellcourt, 312 Minn. 263
- State v. Filippi 335 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1983
- State v. Filippi 335 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1983
- State v. Coles 328 N.W.2d 157 Minn. 1983
- State v. Coles 328 N.W.2d 157 Minn. 1983
- State v. Nelson 326 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 1982
-
State v. Nelson
326 N.W.2d 917
Minn. 1982
Cases supporting the trial court’s
- State v. Weibel 314 N.W.2d 231 Minn. 1982
- State v. Weibel 314 N.W.2d 231 Minn. 1982
- State v. Morrison 310 N.W.2d 135 Minn. 1981
- State v. Morrison 310 N.W.2d 135 Minn. 1981
- State v. Hinkle 310 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 1981
- State v. Hinkle 310 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 1981
- State v. Makela 309 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1981
- State v. Makela 309 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1981