Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Hjerstrom, 287 N.W.2d 625.

69 citing documents.

  • State v. Halverson 381 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Gonzales-Guerrero 364 N.W.2d 792 Minn. 1985
  • State v. Gonzales-Guerrero 364 N.W.2d 792 Minn. 1985
    *794 we stated that “[A]ssuming a proper objection, immaterial and irrelevant portions of an extrajudicial interrogation of a defendant should generally not be received in evidence.” Under Rule 403, of course, even relevant parts of such an interrogation should be excluded if the potential of those parts
  • State v. Stephenson 361 N.W.2d 844 Minn. 1985
  • State v. Stephenson 361 N.W.2d 844 Minn. 1985
    1564 , 51 L.Ed.2d 782 (1977) (evidence that during course of subsequent kidnapping defendant confessed that he committed charged offense, murder); (confession by defendant to police containing reference to crimes other than charged crime).
  • State v. Czech 343 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Czech 343 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1984
    we stated that, "assuming a proper objection, immaterial and irrelevant portions of an extrajudicial interrogation of a defendant should generally not be received in evidence.” The test that the trial court must use in determining what to admit and what not to admit in such a case is the basic test
  • State v. Marhoun 323 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Marhoun 323 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “[A]ssuming a proper objection, immaterial and irrelevant portions of an extrajudicial interrogation of a defendant should generally not be received in evidence.” 2 .
  • State v. Callahan 310 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Callahan 310 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Lloyd 310 N.W.2d 463 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Lloyd 310 N.W.2d 463 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Makela 309 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Makela 309 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Goar 295 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Goar 295 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1980
    Thus, we upheld the use of evidence of this sort to rebut an impression created by defendant that the police had not let him give a complete version of what happened.
  • State v. Knight 295 N.W.2d 592 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Knight 295 N.W.2d 592 Minn. 1980