Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Olson, 291 N.W.2d 203.

32 citing documents.

State v. Moua Her 750 N.W.2d 258 Minn. 2008
State v. Greenleaf 591 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1999
State v. Greenleaf 591 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1999
1930 ; (stating that because of their unreliability, the admission of such statements may result in a denial of a defendant’s constitutional right to confront the witnesses against him).
State v. Warren 592 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1999
State v. Warren 592 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1999
two 180-month sentences to be served consecutively for shooting two clerks and two customers during a robbery); Miller, d at 239 (three consecutive life sentences for shooting three victims in the head at close range); Brom, d at 761 (16-year-old sentenced to three consecutive life sentences and one concurrent sentence for killing four family members with an ax); (three consecutive life sentences for burning three people to death); Bangert, d at 543 (two consecutive life sentences for killing tw
State v. Byers 570 N.W.2d 487 Minn. 1997
State v. Wilson 539 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 1995
State v. Wilson 539 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 1995
(stabbing two people to death, one being a two-and-one-half year old child); Brom, d at 765 (axing four people to death); (methodically burning three people to death); Bangert, d at 546-47 (shooting and killing two victims in their sleep).
State v. Chao Yang 533 N.W.2d 81 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Patrick 512 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Patrick 512 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
1431, 1436 , 89 L.Ed.2d 674 (1986)
State v. Lee 491 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1992
State v. Lee 491 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1992
§ 609.15, *902 (<); Brom, d at 765 (three consecutive life sentences appropriate where defendant killed family members with an ax); (three consecutive life sentences appropriate where defendant methodically burned victims to death).
State v. Miller 488 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1992
State v. Miller 488 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1992
State v. Schilling 474 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Schilling 474 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
The remaining evidence must be “overwhelmingly persuasive of defendant’s guilt.” (citations omitted).
State v. Brom 463 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1990
State v. Brom 463 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1990
Olson, this court concluded that consecutive life sentences were indeed appropriate where a defendant “with premeditation methodically burned three people to death.” Id.
State v. Lanam 459 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1990
State v. Watts 452 N.W.2d 728 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Watts 452 N.W.2d 728 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
see also Green, 668 F.2d at 430 (violation of the confrontation clause does not require reversal if properly admitted evidence of guilt is overwhelming and the prejudicial effect of a co-defendant’s statement is so insignificant the admission was harmless error) (quoting Schneble v. Florida, 405 U.S.
State v. Richardson 363 N.W.2d 793 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Richardson 363 N.W.2d 793 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Langley 354 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 1984
State v. Langley 354 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 1984
Nonetheless, we held, that a defendant who procures the absence of a witness by threats, bribes or intimidation is precluded from asserting his right of confrontation.
State v. Ture 353 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 1984
State v. Ture 353 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 1984
State v. Hansen 312 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 1981
State v. Hansen 312 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 1981
State v. Black 291 N.W.2d 208 Minn. 1980
State v. Black 291 N.W.2d 208 Minn. 1980
It should logically follow that none of the participants in a conspiracy should profit from the misconduct of any of the other participants (see, , filed herewith).