Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Larson Ex Rel. Larson v. Independent School District No. 314, Braham, 289 N.W.2d 112.

98 citing documents.

City of Crystal Police Relief Ass'n v. City of Crystal 477 N.W.2d 728 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Sayers Ex Rel. Sayers v. Beltrami County 472 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Sayers Ex Rel. Sayers v. Beltrami County 472 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Johnson v. Morris 453 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1990
Johnson v. Morris 453 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1990
Sloper v. Dodge 426 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Sloper v. Dodge 426 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See Larson v. Independent School District No. 314, Braham
Snyder v. City of Minneapolis 422 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Snyder v. City of Minneapolis 422 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
It is the decisionmaking process used by the government officer, agency, or employee which must be examined: “The crucial focus is upon the nature of the act undertaken.” Larson v. Independent School District No. 314, Braham
Lawler v. Soo Line Railroad 424 N.W.2d 313 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Lawler v. Soo Line Railroad 424 N.W.2d 313 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Larson v. Independent School District No. 314
Johnston v. Michael Shea and Associates 425 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Johnston v. Michael Shea and Associates 425 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
“Discretionary immunity must be narrowly construed in light of the fact that it is an exception to the general rule of [governmental] liability.” See Larson v. Independent School District No. 314
Elwood v. County of Rice 423 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 1988
Elwood v. County of Rice 423 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 1988
Nusbaum v. County of Blue Earth 422 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 1988
Nusbaum v. County of Blue Earth 422 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 1988
No. 14, this court again dealt with discretionary immunity.
In Re the Appointment of a Trustee for the Heirs of Jones 419 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In Re the Appointment of a Trustee for the Heirs of Jones 419 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Larson v. Independent School District No. 314
Chabot v. City of Sauk Rapids 412 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Chabot v. City of Sauk Rapids 412 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Larson v. Independent School District No. 314, Braham
Engle v. Hennepin County 412 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Engle v. Hennepin County 412 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The re-entry facilitator in Cairl , and Dickel here, are not making decisions on the “executive, planning level of government” as contemplated by Larson v. Independent School District No. 314
Nusbaum v. County of Blue Earth 411 N.W.2d 917 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Nusbaum v. County of Blue Earth 411 N.W.2d 917 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Larson v. Independent School District No. 314
Diedrich v. State 393 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Diedrich v. State 393 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
ry duty, whether or not the discretion is abused.” The issue, whether allegedly negligent governmental acts by a state hospital constitute an exercise of discretion, is fraught with difficulty because the term ‘discretion’ has been “subject to enigmatic application and occasional breakdown.” (citing Larson v. Independent School District # 314, Braham, ).
Gruening v. Pinotti 392 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Gruening v. Pinotti 392 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
No. 314, -23 (Minn.1980) (presumption not sufficiently rebutted by inference).
Grossman v. School Board of I.S.D. 640 389 N.W.2d 532 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Grossman v. School Board of I.S.D. 640 389 N.W.2d 532 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(citing Larson v. Independent School District No. 314, Williamson v. Cain, 310 Minn. 59 , ).
Johnson v. County of Nicollet 387 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Johnson v. County of Nicollet 387 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Larson v. Independent School District No. 314
Waseca Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Olson 379 N.W.2d 592 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Waseca Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Olson 379 N.W.2d 592 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The Minnesota Supreme Court has stated, “Objections to evidentiary rulings which are not assigned as error in a motion for a new trial are not reviewable by this court on appeal from judgment.” Larson v. Independent School District No. 314, , 118 n. 12 (Minn.1979).
Bird v. State, Department of Public Safety 375 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Bird v. State, Department of Public Safety 375 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Robinson v. Hollatz 374 N.W.2d 300 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Robinson v. Hollatz 374 N.W.2d 300 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Larson v. Independent School District No. 314
Lyons v. State Ex Rel. Humphrey Ex Rel. Pung 366 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Lyons v. State Ex Rel. Humphrey Ex Rel. Pung 366 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Ostendorf v. Kenyon 347 N.W.2d 834 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Ostendorf v. Kenyon 347 N.W.2d 834 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Green-Glo Turf Farms, Inc. v. State 347 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1984
Cairl v. State 323 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1982
Cairl v. State 323 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1982
As this court recently stated, that determination “has been subject to enigmatic application and occasional breakdown.” Larson v. Independent School District No. 314
Wilson v. City of Eagan 297 N.W.2d 146 Minn. 1980
Wilson v. City of Eagan 297 N.W.2d 146 Minn. 1980
Larson v. Independent School District No. 314, , 121—23 (Minn.1979).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by