Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Johnson v. Aid Ins. Co. of Des Moines, Ia., 287 N.W.2d 663.
-
Raymond Kvalvog, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Co. of Des Moines, 7 But Kvalvog points to no cases that require an insurer to investigate to minimize the amount the insurer itself pays to resolve a claim.
- Truck v. Teixidor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
King’s Cove Marina, LLC, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Co. of Des Moines, I owa., -65 (Minn. 1980).
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, judgment creditor, Respondent/Co-Appellant v. Justin Beauchane, Judgment Debtor, and North Star Mutual … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, judgment creditor, Respondent/Co-Appellant v. Justin Beauchane, Judgment Debtor, and North Star Mutual …
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Co. of Des Moines, Iowa.
- Reinsurance Ass'n of Minnesota v. Timmer 641 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
-
Reinsurance Ass'n of Minnesota v. Timmer
641 N.W.2d 302
Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Co., we are not convinced that the law allows the court to determine coverage on the basis of claims that could have been made (for example, are suggested by the fact pattern) but were not.
- St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co. v. Dahlberg, Inc. 596 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co. v. Dahlberg, Inc.
596 N.W.2d 674
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Co., see Franklin, d at 407 (recognizing insurer is required to defend claim if on notice that claim is within policy’s coverage); 14 George J. Couch et al., Couch on Insurance § 51:51, at 499-501 (2d rev. ed.1982) (noting duty to defend is fixed on facts learned from complaint, insured, or other
- Franklin v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 574 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 1998
- Franklin v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 574 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 1998
- Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co. 552 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
-
Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.
552 N.W.2d 738
Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Co. of Des Moines, (involving repetition of behavior already shown to cause damage).
- Fluoroware, Inc. v. Chubb Group of Insurance Companies 545 N.W.2d 678 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- Fluoroware, Inc. v. Chubb Group of Insurance Companies 545 N.W.2d 678 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- Tschimperle v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 529 N.W.2d 421 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-
Tschimperle v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.
529 N.W.2d 421
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Co., see also Garvis v. Employers Mut.
- Rohrer v. Rick 529 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-
Rohrer v. Rick
529 N.W.2d 406
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Co., , 665 n. 2 (Minn.1980).
- City of Maple Lake v. American States Insurance Co. 509 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- City of Maple Lake v. American States Insurance Co. 509 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Garvis v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. 497 N.W.2d 254 Minn. 1993
- Garvis v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. 497 N.W.2d 254 Minn. 1993
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. National Computer Systems, Inc. 490 N.W.2d 626 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. National Computer Systems, Inc. 490 N.W.2d 626 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Briggs 464 N.W.2d 535 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Briggs 464 N.W.2d 535 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Corp. v. Advance Roofing & Supply Co. 788 P.2d 1227 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- Farmers Union Oil Co. v. Mutual Service Insurance Co. 422 N.W.2d 530 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
Farmers Union Oil Co. v. Mutual Service Insurance Co.
422 N.W.2d 530
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(where an insured contractor willfully and knowingly violated contract specifications and established standards of workmanship, there was not an “occurrence” as defined in the policy).
- Sender v. Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Co. 415 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Sender v. Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Co. 415 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co. v. Judd Co. 380 N.W.2d 122 Minn. 1986
- Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co. v. Judd Co. 380 N.W.2d 122 Minn. 1986