DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Martin, 293 N.W.2d 54.

24 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    The state must prove every element of an offense beyond a reasonable doubt, (citing In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 364 (1970)), including the identity of the person who committed the offense
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    When reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, appellate courts conduct a “painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.” ().
  • State of Minnesota, Minn. 2020
  • State v. Ortega 813 N.W.2d 86 Minn. 2012
  • State v. Ortega 813 N.W.2d 86 Minn. 2012
    When considering a claim of insufficient evidence, our review “is limited to a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.” ().
  • Wright v. State 765 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 2009
  • Wright v. State 765 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 2009
    When reviewing the sufficiency of the evi *93 dence to support a conviction, we conduct “a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.” ().
  • State v. Brown 597 N.W.2d 299 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Brown 597 N.W.2d 299 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Burrell 506 N.W.2d 34 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Burrell 506 N.W.2d 34 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Webb 440 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1989
  • State v. Webb 440 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1989
  • State v. Triplett 435 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 1989
  • State v. Triplett 435 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 1989
  • State v. Alladin 408 N.W.2d 642 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Cabrales 392 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Cabrales 392 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Andrews 388 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1986
  • State v. Andrews 388 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1986
  • State v. Liggons 348 N.W.2d 785 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Liggons 348 N.W.2d 785 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    as authority for his argument that a murder conviction cannot be based upon testimony of witnesses who had been drinking heavily at the time of the murder and who were unable to fully observe the assault or were uncertain at trial of their observations.