Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Walton v. Jones, 286 N.W.2d 710.

65 citing documents.

Hyduke v. Grant 351 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hyduke v. Grant 351 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hauser v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad 346 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 1984
Wohlfeil v. Murray MacHinery, Inc. 344 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Wohlfeil v. Murray MacHinery, Inc. 344 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Recognizing the broad discretion trial courts have on matters relating to expert testimony, , 92 n. 1 (Minn.1983), we cannot say the trial court abused its discretion in excluding the opinion.
Chemlease Worldwide Inc. v. Brace, Inc. 338 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 1983
Chemlease Worldwide Inc. v. Brace, Inc. 338 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 1983
Nemanic v. Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal, Inc. 337 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1983
Nemanic v. Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal, Inc. 337 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1983
Reinhardt v. Colton 337 N.W.2d 88 Minn. 1983
Reinhardt v. Colton 337 N.W.2d 88 Minn. 1983
Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc. 330 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 1983
Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc. 330 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 1983
Clark v. Chicago & N.W.
Harvey v. Fridley Medical Center, P.A. 315 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1982
Harvey v. Fridley Medical Center, P.A. 315 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1982
When expert testimony is essential to a plaintiff’s proof, it “must demonstrate a reasonable probability that defendant’s negligence was the proximate cause of the injury.” (emphasis in original).