Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters, 293 N.W.2d 822.

121 citing documents.

Jostens, Inc. v. CNA Insurance/Continental Casualty Co. 403 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1987
CNA cites as support our decision in Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters, which held that the duty to defend is broader in scope than the duty to indemnify.
American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Peterson 393 N.W.2d 212 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Peterson 393 N.W.2d 212 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Peterson’s battery was clearly not “reflexive,” Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters, or done in self-defense, -77 (Minn.1977).
Gamble Skogmo, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 390 N.W.2d 343 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Gamble Skogmo, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 390 N.W.2d 343 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Likewise, the insurer was obligated to defend in Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters
Mattson v. Underwriters at Lloyds of London 385 N.W.2d 854 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Mattson v. Underwriters at Lloyds of London 385 N.W.2d 854 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Brown v. State Auto & Gas, Morrison v. Swenson, 274 Minn. 127, 138
Kline v. Hanover Insurance Co. 368 N.W.2d 381 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kline v. Hanover Insurance Co. 368 N.W.2d 381 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
llowed in declaratory judgments determining insurance coverage because “an insurance contract is intended to relieve the insured of the financial burden of litigation” and because the declaratory judgment costs are considered “consequential damages.” Lanoue v. Fireman’s Fund American Insurance Companies, accord, Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters
City of Thief River Falls v. United Fire & Casualty Co. 336 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1983
City of Thief River Falls v. United Fire & Casualty Co. 336 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1983
Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters
Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto's, Inc. 336 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1983
Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto's, Inc. 336 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1983
The trial court cited Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters, to support its award of attorney fees to Tonto’s. Brown does not justify an award in this case.
Thompson v. Estate of Petroff 319 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 1982
Thompson v. Estate of Petroff 319 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 1982
Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters
Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Cady 318 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 1982
Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Cady 318 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 1982
See Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters, Hartford Fire Ins.
Smith v. Senst 313 N.W.2d 202 Minn. 1981
Distinguished Smith v. Senst 313 N.W.2d 202 Minn. 1981
The facts in this case are similar to, but nevertheless distinguishable from, those in Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters
Woida v. North Star Mutual Insurance Co. 306 N.W.2d 570 Minn. 1981
Woida v. North Star Mutual Insurance Co. 306 N.W.2d 570 Minn. 1981
Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters