Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Black, 291 N.W.2d 208.
- State v. Hannuksela 452 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1990
- State v. Hannuksela 452 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1990
- State v. Hazley 428 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
State v. Hazley
428 N.W.2d 406
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(statements may be edited to exclude non-inculpatory portions).
- State v. Scruggs 421 N.W.2d 707 Minn. 1988
- State v. Scruggs 421 N.W.2d 707 Minn. 1988
- State v. Thompson 413 N.W.2d 889 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
State v. Thompson
413 N.W.2d 889
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(witness’ statement deeply involving her in planning of crime was against interest despite denial of knowledge of crime to be committed).
- Lande v. State 406 N.W.2d 574 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Lande v. State 406 N.W.2d 574 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Durante 406 N.W.2d 80 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Durante 406 N.W.2d 80 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Wanglie v. State 398 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Wanglie v. State 398 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Iverson 396 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
State v. Iverson
396 N.W.2d 599
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
the Minnesota Supreme Court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the co-conspirator’s statements against penal interest made to the police.
- State v. Page 386 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Page 386 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Halverson 381 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Halverson 381 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Daniels 380 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1986
-
State v. Daniels
380 N.W.2d 777
Minn. 1986
: Independent evidence need only be sufficient to make a prima facie showing of the existence of the conspiracy to allow in statements of co-conspirators.
- State v. Buschkopf 373 N.W.2d 756 Minn. 1985
- State v. Buschkopf 373 N.W.2d 756 Minn. 1985
- State v. Wright 371 N.W.2d 238 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Wright 371 N.W.2d 238 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Swanson 353 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 1984
- State v. Swanson 353 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 1984
- State v. Blue 327 N.W.2d 7 Minn. 1982
- State v. Blue 327 N.W.2d 7 Minn. 1982
- State v. Hansen 312 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 1981
-
State v. Hansen
312 N.W.2d 96
Minn. 1981
we held that the witness’ statements to police and her testimony at a prior trial were statements against penal interest under 804(b)(3) when they inculpated the defendant as well as the witness.
- State v. Olson 291 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 1980
- State v. Olson 291 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 1980