Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Tracy v. Streater/Litton Industries, 283 N.W.2d 909.

38 citing documents.

Allan v. R.D. Offutt Co. 869 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 2015
Allan v. R.D. Offutt Co. 869 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 2015
3 (2014)); see also Tracy v. Streater/Litton Indus., (“[T]he legislature has made impairment of function compensable for its own sake in the form of damages separate and distinct from wage loss.”).
Alcozer v. North Country Food Bank 635 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2001
D.W. Hutt Consultants, Inc. v. Construction Maintenance Systems, Inc. 526 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
D.W. Hutt Consultants, Inc. v. Construction Maintenance Systems, Inc. 526 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Tracy v. Streater/Litton Indus., see also 3A Norman J. Singer, Sutherland Stat. Const. § 73.02 (5th ed. 1992).
Parson v. Holman Erection Co., Inc. 428 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 1988
Parson v. Holman Erection Co., Inc. 428 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 1988
In the context of reviewing the constitutional validity of the Workers’ Compensation Act, we have declared that “neither a one-for-one balance nor a reasonable substitute for abrogated common law rights is required for validity.” Tracy v. Streater/Litton Industries
Schmidt v. Modern Metals Foundry, Inc. 424 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1988
Schmidt v. Modern Metals Foundry, Inc. 424 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1988
In considering the validity of this trade-off, “a constitutional evaluation looks to the ultimate scheme in its entirety.” Tracy v. Streater/Litton Industries
Kirchner v. County of Anoka 410 N.W.2d 825 Minn. 1987
Kirchner v. County of Anoka 410 N.W.2d 825 Minn. 1987
Tracy v. Streater/Litton Industries
Moes v. City of St. Paul 402 N.W.2d 520 Minn. 1987
Moes v. City of St. Paul 402 N.W.2d 520 Minn. 1987
We later expanded our analysis of permanent partial disability benefits in Tracy v. Streater/Litton Indus., a consolidation of three cases in which the central issues were whether Minn.Stat.
Bergeson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 398 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bergeson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 398 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Appellants claim respondent intentionally concealed the availability of partial disability benefits and home nursing payments, hoping not to get “caught.” See Tracy v. Streater/Litton Industries
Sweep v. Hanson Silo Co. 391 N.W.2d 817 Minn. 1986
Sweep v. Hanson Silo Co. 391 N.W.2d 817 Minn. 1986
See Tracy v. Streater/Litton Industries, Morehouse v. Geo.
Broos v. Portec, Inc. 376 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 1985
Broos v. Portec, Inc. 376 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 1985
Tracy v. Streater/Litton Industries, (dictum); Boltz, supra; Yaeger, supra.
Buganski v. Onan Corp. 351 N.W.2d 637 Minn. 1984
Buganski v. Onan Corp. 351 N.W.2d 637 Minn. 1984
See Lerich v. Thermo Systems, Inc., Tracy v. Streater/Litton Industries
Mack v. City of Minneapolis 350 N.W.2d 373 Minn. 1984
Mack v. City of Minneapolis 350 N.W.2d 373 Minn. 1984
However, once it was established that employee was not brain dead, the other issues concerning his claimed permanent partial disabilities and the applicability of the simultaneous injury factor were controlled by Tracy v. Streater/Litton, and Lerich v. Thermo Systems, Inc.
Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Swanson 341 N.W.2d 285 Minn. 1983
Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Swanson 341 N.W.2d 285 Minn. 1983
3 (1982), and to ensure “the protection of the lives and safety of those concerned * * * [citation omitted].” Tracy v. Streater/Litton Industries, 915 (Minn.1979).
Buganski v. Onan Corp. 338 N.W.2d 586 Minn. 1983
Buganski v. Onan Corp. 338 N.W.2d 586 Minn. 1983
Cf. Tracy v. Streater/Litton Industries, Lerich v. Thermo Systems, Inc.
Guggenberger v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 332 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 1983
Calder v. City of Crystal 318 N.W.2d 838 Minn. 1982
Calder v. City of Crystal 318 N.W.2d 838 Minn. 1982
See Tracy v. Streater/Litton Industries, Haney v. International Harvester Co., 294 Minn. 375
Smith v. Armour and Co. 316 N.W.2d 925 Minn. 1982
Smith v. Armour and Co. 316 N.W.2d 925 Minn. 1982
A. Hormel & Co., Tracy v. Streater/Litton Industries
Tri-State Ins. Co. of Minn. v. Bouma 306 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 1981
Tri-State Ins. Co. of Minn. v. Bouma 306 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 1981
See Tracy v. Streater/Litton Industries, Haney v. International Harvester Co., 294 Minn. 375
Lerich v. Thermo Systems, Inc. 292 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 1980
Lerich v. Thermo Systems, Inc. 292 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 1980
Relators denied liability to pay both temporary total and permanent partial disability benefits concurrently on the ground that the statute so requiring was unconstitutional, a claim ultimately settled by this court’s determination in Tracy v. Streater/Litton Industries
Mitchell v. White Castle Systems, Inc. 290 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 1980
Mitchell v. White Castle Systems, Inc. 290 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 1980
Our recent decisions in Tracy v. Streater/Litton Industries, holding concurrent awards permissible, involved Minn.Stat.