Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Matter of Welfare of Dahl, 278 N.W.2d 316.

37 citing documents.

In Re Welfare of D.M.D. 607 N.W.2d 432 Minn. 2000
In Re Welfare of D.M.D. 607 N.W.2d 432 Minn. 2000
In Re the Welfare of D.T.H. 572 N.W.2d 742 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
In Re the Welfare of D.T.H. 572 N.W.2d 742 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
In Re the Welfare of C.L.S. 558 N.W.2d 12 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
In Re the Welfare of C.L.S. 558 N.W.2d 12 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-21 (1979) (adult court certification); S.W.N., d at 17 (EJJ certification).
In Re the Welfare of S.J.G. 547 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Matter of Swn 541 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
In re the Welfare of S.W.N. 541 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Matter of Swn 541 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
In re the Welfare of S.W.N. 541 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
In Re the Welfare of M.E.P. 523 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
In Re the Welfare of M.E.P. 523 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
reaffirmed its holding in that reference cannot be based solely on the juvenile’s age and the seriousness of the offense.
Matter of Anj 521 N.W.2d 889 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
In re the Welfare of A.N.J. 521 N.W.2d 889 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Matter of Anj 521 N.W.2d 889 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
R.D.W., d at 117 ; (remanded case for consideration of all reference factors, including psychological evaluation).
In re the Welfare of A.N.J. 521 N.W.2d 889 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
we stated that the determination that an accused is not amenable for treatment “must be based upon psychological data or a history of misconduct as well as the juvenile’s age, level of maturity, and the seriousness of the offense.” R.D.W., d at 117 ; (remanded case for consideration of all reference factors, including psychological evaluation).
In Re the Welfare of J.D.P. 439 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re the Welfare of J.D.P. 439 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
This review of the entire record is to involve the multifactor analysis discussed in and the totality of the circumstances factors set forth in Minn.R.Juv.Ct.
In Re the Welfare of J.L.B. 435 N.W.2d 595 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re the Welfare of J.L.B. 435 N.W.2d 595 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
We recognize the continued validity of the multifactor analysis enunciated in
In Re the Welfare of T.L.C. 435 N.W.2d 581 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re the Welfare of T.L.C. 435 N.W.2d 581 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-21 (Minn.1979); D.F.B., d at 80 (refuting construction of statute such that “reference is justified any time a juvenile commits a heinous offense”).
In Re the Welfare of D.F.B. 433 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1988
In Re the Welfare of D.F.B. 433 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1988
After thoughtful and careful consideration, the district court concluded that the facts were analogous to those in and that — given its conclusion that Dahl is still good law in a case such as this where the juvenile has produced substantial evidence of amenability to treatment in the juvenile court system consistent with the public safety — it had no choice but to deny the reference petition, much as it was otherwise
In Re the Welfare of D.F.B. 430 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In Re the Welfare of D.F.B. 430 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
The 1980 amendments were the legislative response to
In Re the Welfare of S.R.L. 400 N.W.2d 382 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of S.R.L. 400 N.W.2d 382 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Matter of Welfare of TRC 398 N.W.2d 662 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Matter of Welfare of TRC 398 N.W.2d 662 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of D.M. 373 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of D.M. 373 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Welfare of S. R. J. v. State 293 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1980
Welfare of S. R. J. v. State 293 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1980
In Re the Welfare of K. P. H. 289 N.W.2d 722 Minn. 1980
In Re the Welfare of K. P. H. 289 N.W.2d 722 Minn. 1980
As this court stated recently in however, application of the Hogan factors was not intended to result in adult referral solely because of the alleged offense.