Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Gryc Ex Rel. Gryc v. Dayton-Hudson Corp., 297 N.W.2d 727.

53 citing documents.

Senogles v. Carlson 902 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 2017
Senogles v. Carlson 902 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 2017
See Heitman v. Lake City, 225 Minn. 117 , (stating, “[c]hil-dren, through childish inattention, may fail to observe conditions which an adult might reasonably be expected to discover,” in a case involving a 7-year-old child who drowned); (stating that a 4-year-old child was “incapable of appreciating the risk” that her pajamas could ignite from an electric burner); Doren v. Nw.
Schroeder v. St. Louis County 708 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 2006
Jensen v. Walsh 609 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Jensen v. Walsh 609 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
First, as noted by the supreme court, the remedy of punitive damages concerns the “ 'vital state interest of protecting persons against personal injury.’ ” Keene, d at 732 (quoting G ).
Molenaar v. United Cattle Co. 553 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Molenaar v. United Cattle Co. 553 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Soucek v. Banham 524 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Soucek v. Banham 524 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
(citation omitted) ( cert.
Independent School District No. 622 v. Keene Corp. 511 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 1994
Independent School District No. 622 v. Keene Corp. 511 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 1994
The remedy of punitive damages concerns the “vital state interest of protecting persons against personal injury,” cert.
Muehlstedt v. City of Lino Lakes 473 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Muehlstedt v. City of Lino Lakes 473 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
We will not disturb a punitive damages award “unless it appears that the award was actuated by passion and prejudice and is so excessive as to be deemed unreasonable.” cert.
Tomfohr v. Mayo Foundation 450 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1990
Tomfohr v. Mayo Foundation 450 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1990
Forster v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. 437 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 1989
Forster v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. 437 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 1989
Estate of Hartz v. Nelson 437 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Estate of Hartz v. Nelson 437 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp. 430 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp. 430 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Forster v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. 423 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Forster v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. 423 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. 426 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 1988
Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. 426 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 1988
Thistlethwaite v. Grover 405 N.W.2d 534 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Thistlethwaite v. Grover 405 N.W.2d 534 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Wikert v. Northern Sand and Gravel, Inc. 402 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Wikert v. Northern Sand and Gravel, Inc. 402 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Law v. Essick Manufacturing Co. 396 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Law v. Essick Manufacturing Co. 396 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
51; -39 (Minn.1980), cert., denied, 449 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct.
Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States 389 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1986
Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States 389 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1986
McCormick v. Custom Pools, Inc. 376 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
McCormick v. Custom Pools, Inc. 376 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Peppin v. W.H. Brady Co. 372 N.W.2d 369 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Peppin v. W.H. Brady Co. 372 N.W.2d 369 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
However, as Brady’s counsel correctly notes, the court at that time referred spe *374 which stated that a manufacturer will be strictly liable for failure to warn of all dangers associated with products of which it has actual or constructive notice.
Potthoff v. Jefferson Lines, Inc. 363 N.W.2d 771 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Potthoff v. Jefferson Lines, Inc. 363 N.W.2d 771 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See, e.g., Furley Sales, d at 28 ; -39 (Minn.), cert.
Lesmeister v. Dilly 330 N.W.2d 95 Minn. 1983
Lesmeister v. Dilly 330 N.W.2d 95 Minn. 1983
Zylka v. Leikvoll, 274 Minn. 435, 446 , -39 (Minn.1980), cert.
Furlev Sales & Associates, Inc. v. North American Automotive Warehouse, Inc. 325 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1982
Furlev Sales & Associates, Inc. v. North American Automotive Warehouse, Inc. 325 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1982
51; -39 (Minn.1980), cert.
Hudson v. Snyder Body, Inc. 326 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 1982
Hudson v. Snyder Body, Inc. 326 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 1982
The Court feels that there may be a basis to warrant the changing of the answer to question number 14 to the negative as the evidence would possibly sustain such; however, in view of the case of Gryc v. Dayton Hudson Corporation et al., [ ] (1980), the Court feels that such a change is unnecessary.
Thompson v. Estate of Petroff 319 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 1982
Thompson v. Estate of Petroff 319 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 1982
See, C. McCormick, Handbook of the Law of Damages § 77 (1935); W. Prosser, supra, § 2 at 9.
Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. 314 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1982
Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. 314 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1982
We first awarded punitive damages in a strict liability action in Gryc v. Dayton- *229 Hudson Corp., cert.
State Ex Rel. Lord v. First National Bank of Saint Paul 313 N.W.2d 390 Minn. 1981