Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Siegfried, 274 N.W.2d 113.

101 citing documents.

State v. McGrath 706 N.W.2d 532 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
-15 (Minn. 1978); review denied (Minn. Nov.
State v. Carter 697 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 2005
State v. Carter 697 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 2005
State v. Jones 678 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2004
State v. Jones 678 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2004
This is especially true when it is a “first-time citizen informer ⅜ *' * who is not involved in the criminal underworld and who has no track record as a police informant.”
State v. Balenger 667 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Balenger 667 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Safety, (concluding that CB radio communication from unidentified trucker was sufficient to support investigative stop of car, even though trooper saw nothing improper in operation of car, because trucker was private citizen and his reliability could be presumed); (concluding that first-time citizen informer’s credibility is generally presumed); see also State v. Lindquist, 295 Minn. 398, 400 , (considering fact that tipster was first-time private citizen informer not involved in the criminal ev
State v. Ward 580 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Ward 580 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Lozar 458 N.W.2d 434 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Lozar 458 N.W.2d 434 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. McCloskey 453 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1990
State v. McCloskey 453 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1990
(the case contains information helpful to the police when drafting an affidavit based on information provided by a citizen informer).
State v. McCloskey 451 N.W.2d 225 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. McCloskey 451 N.W.2d 225 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Reese 446 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Reese 446 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
We note that in this state “the credibility of a so-called first-time citizen informer generally is presumed.”
State v. Anderson 439 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Anderson 439 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
(lack of showing of informant’s reliability is not fatal where the tip is corroborated); (warrant may place “minimal reliance” on informant’s tip even if informant’s reliability not shown where there is an independent source).
State v. Olson 436 N.W.2d 92 Minn. 1989
State v. Olson 436 N.W.2d 92 Minn. 1989
“[T]he fact that police can corroborate part of the informer’s tip as truthful may suggest that the entire tip is reliable.”
State v. Gabbert 411 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Velishek 410 N.W.2d 893 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Gabbert 411 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Velishek 410 N.W.2d 893 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In addition, the Minnesota Supreme Court has stressed that information is presumed reli *896 able when it is from an identified citizen-informer as opposed to an unidentified informant from the criminal “underworld.”
State v. Krech 399 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Krech 399 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(lack of showing of informant’s reliability is not fatal where the tip is corroborated); (warrant may place “minimal reliance” on informant’s tip even if informant’s reliability not shown where there is an independent source).
State v. Joon Kyu Kim 398 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1987
State v. Joon Kyu Kim 398 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1987
State v. Balsimo 389 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Balsimo 389 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Olson v. Commissioner of Public Safety 371 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1985
Olson v. Commissioner of Public Safety 371 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1985
(a first-time citizen informer’s credibility generally is presumed; such a person is “one who is not involved in the criminal underworld and who has no track record as a police informant”).
State v. Carr 361 N.W.2d 397 Minn. 1985
State v. Carr 361 N.W.2d 397 Minn. 1985
State v. Eling 355 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1984
State v. Eling 355 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1984
See, d at 41 (circuitous route is corroborative evidence); (information given by first-time citizen informant is presumed reliable); United States v. McGlynn, 671 F.2d 1140, 1143 (8th Cir.1982) (finding of trial court that police had probable cause for arrest may not be set aside unless clearly erroneous).
State v. Marhoun 323 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 1982
State v. Marhoun 323 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 1982
State v. Carson 320 N.W.2d 432 Minn. 1982
State v. Carson 320 N.W.2d 432 Minn. 1982
State v. Kemp 305 N.W.2d 322 Minn. 1981
State v. Kemp 305 N.W.2d 322 Minn. 1981
For a detailed analysis of these relevant principles
State v. Buchholtz 295 N.W.2d 629 Minn. 1980
State v. Buchholtz 295 N.W.2d 629 Minn. 1980
State v. Neville 293 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1980
State v. Neville 293 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1980
1623 , 10 L.Ed.2d 726 (1963); State v. Buchwald, 293 Minn. 74
State v. Yaritz 287 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1979
State v. Yaritz 287 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1979
State v. Hawkins 278 N.W.2d 750 Minn. 1979