Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Caldwell, 322 N.W.2d 574.

163 citing documents.

State v. Swanson 353 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 1984
State v. Swanson 353 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 1984
State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58, 64
State v. Jahnke 353 N.W.2d 606 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Jahnke 353 N.W.2d 606 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Cermak 350 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1984
State v. Cermak 350 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1984
State v. Liggons 348 N.W.2d 785 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Liggons 348 N.W.2d 785 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In reviewing a claim by a defendant that the evidence submitted at trial was insufficient to form the basis for a conviction, an appellate court “cannot retry the facts but must take the view most favorable to the State and must assume that the jury believed the state’s witnesses and disbelieved any contrary evidence.”
State v. Risken 331 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1983
State v. Risken 331 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1983
State v. Howard 324 N.W.2d 216 Minn. 1982
State v. Johnson 324 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1982
State v. Johnson 324 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1982
Brouillette v. Wood, 636 F.2d 215 (8th Cir.1980), ce rt.