Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Engholm, 290 N.W.2d 780.
- State v. Wellman 355 N.W.2d 331 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
State v. Wellman
355 N.W.2d 331
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The Minnesota Supreme Court has expressed this standard *333 : To lawfully stop a person for questioning * * * a police officer must be able to point to specific and articulable facts which, together with reasonable inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant the invasion of a citizen’s personal security.
- State v. Thomas 352 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Thomas 352 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Marben v. State, Department of Public Safety 294 N.W.2d 697 Minn. 1980
-
Marben v. State, Department of Public Safety
294 N.W.2d 697
Minn. 1980
1391 , 59 L.Ed.2d 660 (1979); State v. McKinley, 305 Minn. 297