Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc., 297 N.W.2d 260.

57 citing documents.

Nelson v. Smith 349 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Nelson v. Smith 349 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
“The terms of a disputed contract are for the jury to decide, and an appellate court will not overturn the jury’s resolution of factual issues if, on the record, it could reasonably have made such findings.” Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc.
Olson v. Aretz 346 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Olson v. Aretz 346 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
* * This rule does not call for absolute certainty.’ (citations omitted) -67 (Minn.1980).
Rancho Pescado, Inc. v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance 680 P.2d 1235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Pine River State Bank v. Mettille 333 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1983
Pine River State Bank v. Mettille 333 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1983
We see no merit in the lack of mutuality argument; the concept of mutuality in contract law has been widely discredited and the right of one party to terminate a contract at will does not invalidate the contract.