Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Cobb v. Midwest Recovery Bureau Co., 295 N.W.2d 232.

26 citing documents.

The Janice Kaunas Samsing Revocable Trust v. Arthur D. Walsh Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The Janice Kaunas Samsing Revocable Trust v. Arthur D. Walsh Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Appellant argues that 1) respondents failed to provide a foreclosure-related notice under Minn. Stat. § 580.041 (2014); 2) 3) the district court erred in applying attorney fees to appellant’s personal judgment obligation; 4) respondents elected to pursue their remedies on the personal judgment and to forego the foreclosure remedy by docketing the judgment against appellant; and 5) pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 541.05, subd.
Rodgers v. General Electric Capital Corp. 596 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Rodgers v. General Electric Capital Corp. 596 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Johns v. Harborage I, Ltd. 585 N.W.2d 853 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Johns v. Harborage I, Ltd. 585 N.W.2d 853 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Molenaar v. United Cattle Co. 553 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Molenaar v. United Cattle Co. 553 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Co., (permitting punitive damages for libel); -38 (Minn.1980) (recognizing punitive damages for some wrongful repossessions).
McNeill v. Dakota County State Bank 522 N.W.2d 381 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
McNeill v. Dakota County State Bank 522 N.W.2d 381 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
In challenging summary judgment
Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. v. O'Connor & Hannan 494 N.W.2d 261 Minn. 1992
Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. v. O'Connor & Hannan 494 N.W.2d 261 Minn. 1992
Robinson v. MacK Trucks, Inc. 426 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Robinson v. MacK Trucks, Inc. 426 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
[Respondents’] punitive damages claim rests solely on their unfounded contention that [appellants] and failed to change their procedures.
Puthukulam v. Yellow Taxi Co. of Minneapolis 413 N.W.2d 548 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Puthukulam v. Yellow Taxi Co. of Minneapolis 413 N.W.2d 548 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See, e.g., Burns v. Northern Pacific Railroad Co., 134 F.2d 766, 771 (8th Cir.1943) (payment of wages and expenses to former employee was not consideration for release of claim for wrongful discharge); (release was without consideration where truck was wrongfully repossessed and plaintiff had legal right to it at that time); (payment of an admitted liability does not provide consideration for compromise and settlement).
Altman v. Knox Lumber Co. 381 N.W.2d 858 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Altman v. Knox Lumber Co. 381 N.W.2d 858 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(award of punitive damages reversed against defendant who in good faith concluded it had statutory authority to act as it did and repossess a car).
Bloomquist v. First National Bank of Elk River 378 N.W.2d 81 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Bloomquist v. First National Bank of Elk River 378 N.W.2d 81 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Steichen v. First Bank Grand 372 N.W.2d 768 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Steichen v. First Bank Grand 372 N.W.2d 768 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Swift County Bank v. United Farmers Elevators 366 N.W.2d 606 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Swift County Bank v. United Farmers Elevators 366 N.W.2d 606 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
United argues that this court should not apply the Wabasso rule in light of the *609 Minnesota Supreme Court’s
Terfehr v. Kleinfehn 352 N.W.2d 470 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Terfehr v. Kleinfehn 352 N.W.2d 470 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
“Punitive damages are not recoverable where the wrongful conduct is merely negligent....”