Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Nunn, 297 N.W.2d 752.

68 citing documents.

  • State v. Hodges 386 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1986
  • State v. Hodges 386 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1986
    Although the crime of burglary carries with it some special risks to life and is not therefore purely a property offense, it nonetheless is classified in the criminal code under the heading “Damage or Trespass to Property.” Thus, we believe that for the purpose of section 609.04, the burglarious entry of one dwelling should justify only one burglary conviction.
  • State v. Aarsvold 376 N.W.2d 518 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Aarsvold 376 N.W.2d 518 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    The Minnesota Supreme Court has held that the purpose of the felony-murder rule is “to isolate for special treatment those felonies that involve some special danger to *522 human life.” -30 (Minn.1984) ().
  • In Re the Welfare of L.R.B. 373 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • In Re the Welfare of L.R.B. 373 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    (quoting Fare v. Michael C., 442 U.S. 707 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Peirce 364 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1985
  • State v. Peirce 364 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1985
    (burglary of a dwelling carries with it the possibility of violence).
  • State v. Zeimet 348 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Zeimet 348 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 1984
    -54 (Minn.1980); State v. Hansen, 286 Minn. 4
  • Matter of Welfare of M.D.S. 345 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1984
  • Matter of Welfare of M.D.S. 345 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1984
    Shortly before amendment we decided, that even under the old felony murder rule (Minn.Stat.
  • State v. Edwards 343 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Edwards 343 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1984
    indicating that if the underlying crime may be characterized as a felony, then it is appropriate to submit felony-murder but not death-in-the-commission-of-a-misdemeanor manslaughter.
  • State v. Back 341 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Back 341 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1983
    However, the felony-murder rule can be used even when the underlying felony is a property offense if that offense, as committed, involves special danger to human life.
  • State v. Filippi 335 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Filippi 335 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1983
    Stated differently, just as burglary of a dwelling “always carries with it the possibility of violence,” a burglary of this sort carries with it the possibility of violence, and it seems reasonable to infer from defendant’s mere intentional participation in the burglary that defendant knew or could foresee that the burglary might result in violence.