Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Matter of Welfare of Clausen, 289 N.W.2d 153.

130 citing documents.

In Re the Welfare of D.T.J. 554 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
P. 59.05 (“[Ajllegations of the petition must be proved by clear and convincing evidence.”); -90 (Minn.1978); (stating that reviewing court will “closely inquire into the sufficiency of the evidence to determine whether the evidence is clear and convincing”).
In Re the Welfare of L.A.F. 546 N.W.2d 55 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Welfare of L.A.F. 546 N.W.2d 55 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
ANALYSIS A natural parent is presumed to be a “fit and suitable person to be entrusted with the care of his child.”
In Re the Welfare of S.Z. 547 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1996
In Re the Welfare of S.Z. 547 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1996
The standard of review in a termination ease is whether “the findings of fact of the juvenile court are supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous.”
In Re the Welfare of M.P. 542 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Welfare of M.P. 542 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
(stating that in termination cases, trial court must consider parent’s conduct up to time of trial).
Matter of Welfare of Sz 536 N.W.2d 37 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Matter of Welfare of Sz 536 N.W.2d 37 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
ANALYSIS A natural parent is presumed to be a “fit and suitable person to be entrusted with the care of his child.”
In Re the Welfare of A.D. 535 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 1995
In Re the Welfare of A.D. 535 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 1995
In Re the Welfare of D.T.N. 508 N.W.2d 790 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In Re the Welfare of D.T.N. 508 N.W.2d 790 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In the Minnesota Supreme Court held that a court could take judicial notice of files and records from its juvenile and criminal divisions and that doing so served the function of judicial notice to expedite litigation by eliminating the cost or delay of proving readily verifiable facts.
In Re the Welfare of J.D.N. 504 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In Re the Welfare of J.D.N. 504 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
This court must “closely inquire into the sufficiency of the evidence to determine whether the evidence is clear and convincing.” R.T.B., d at 3 (citation omitted) ().
In Re the Welfare of R.T.B. 492 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re the Welfare of R.T.B. 492 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
This court must “closely inquire into the sufficiency of the evidence to determine whether the evidence is clear and convincing.” quoted in pet.
Matter of Zemple 489 N.W.2d 818 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Matter of Zemple 489 N.W.2d 818 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re the Welfare of M.S.S. 465 N.W.2d 412 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In Re the Welfare of M.S.S. 465 N.W.2d 412 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In Re the Welfare of H.K. 455 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In Re the Welfare of H.K. 455 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
While some deference is accorded the trial court’s findings, appellate courts “closely inquire into the sufficiency of the evidence to determine whether the evidence is clear and convincing.” ().
Matter of Welfare of Mdo 450 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Matter of Welfare of Mdo 450 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In Re the Welfare of D.C.M. 443 N.W.2d 853 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re the Welfare of D.C.M. 443 N.W.2d 853 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re the Welfare of C.K. 426 N.W.2d 842 Minn. 1988
In Re the Welfare of C.K. 426 N.W.2d 842 Minn. 1988
Matter of Miner 424 N.W.2d 810 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Matter of Miner 424 N.W.2d 810 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In which involved a parental termination proceeding, a trial court had taken judicial notice of files and records from juvenile and criminal divisions of its jurisdiction.
In Re the Welfare of D.C. 415 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of J.H.D. 416 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of D.C. 415 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
On review, “while this court will give some deference to the trial court, it will closely inquire into the sufficiency of the evidence to determine whether the evidence is clear and convincing.”
In Re the Welfare of J.H.D. 416 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of J.W. 415 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1987
In Re the Welfare of J.W. 415 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1987
In Re the Welfare of D.F.B. 412 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of D.F.B. 412 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of M.A. 408 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of M.A. 408 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In summarizing the applicable standard of review, we stated: Although “some deference” is given to the trial court’s findings, the appellate courts “ ‘exercise great caution in termination proceedings,’ ” and will closely inquire into the sufficiency of the evidence to determine whether the evidence is clear and convincing.” ().
In Re the Welfare of M.G. 407 N.W.2d 118 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of M.G. 407 N.W.2d 118 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Although “some deference” is given to the trial court’s findings, appellate courts “ ‘exercise great caution in termination proceedings,’ ” and “will closely inquire into the sufficiency of the evidence to determine whether the evidence is clear and convincing.” ().
In Re the Welfare of A.H. 402 N.W.2d 598 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of A.H. 402 N.W.2d 598 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Smisek v. Commissioner of Public Safety 400 N.W.2d 766 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Smisek v. Commissioner of Public Safety 400 N.W.2d 766 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of J.L.L. 396 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of J.L.L. 396 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Welfare of A.K.K., d at 341 ().
In Re the Welfare of J.J.B. 390 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1986

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by