Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Davies & Davies Agency, Inc. v. Davies, 298 N.W.2d 127.

45 citing documents.

A25-1473 Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Donald Dean Oberfoell, individually and Do-Bid Holdings, LLC, d/b/a Do-Bid Online Auctions, Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
As respondents point out, “Oberfoell did not produce any evidence show ing that anyone contact ed Oberfoell after Kyte’s departure seeking to deal with Kyte, or that if they did, [tha t they] refused to deal with Oberfoell because Kyte was no longer available.” Appellants cite Davies & Davies Agen cy, Inc. v. Davies , as analo gous to this case.
AutoUpLink Technologies, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Advance Contract Equipment and Design LC, d/b/a, Rapids Foodservice Contract and Design v. Kevin LaMere, Horizon Equipment LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Advance Contract Equipment and Design LC, d/b/a, Rapids Foodservice Contract and Design v. Kevin LaMere, Horizon Equipment LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Davies & Davies Agency, (discussing policy reasons for these elements).
Michael A. Knight v. Sean K. McGinity 868 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Michael A. Knight v. Sean K. McGinity 868 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Davies & Davies Agency, (agreeing with district court that no evidence in record showed that refusal to make admissions was unreasonable or in bad faith); –19 (Minn. 1986) (concluding that sanctions against defendants were warranted where their “answer was vexatious, and defenda
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transportation, Inc. 772 N.W.2d 528 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transportation, Inc. 772 N.W.2d 528 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Davies & Davies Agency, -31 (Minn.1980).
Softchoice, Inc. v. Schmidt 763 N.W.2d 660 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Softchoice, Inc. v. Schmidt 763 N.W.2d 660 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
While the delineation between when an employee is informed that he will be promoted and when he is actually promoted may not always be clear, the key inquiry is when the promotion provides the employee with “real advantages.” See Davies & Davies Agency, -31 (Minn.1980) (upholding a non-competition agreement because the employee who signed the agreement “derived *669 substantial economic and professional benefits ...
All Parks Alliance for Change v. Uniprop Manufactured Housing Communities Income Fund 732 N.W.2d 189 Minn. 2007
All Parks Alliance for Change v. Uniprop Manufactured Housing Communities Income Fund 732 N.W.2d 189 Minn. 2007
See, e.g., Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc., , 147 n. 8 (Minn.2002); Davies & Davies Agency, , 131 n. 1 (Minn.1980).
Guercio v. Production Automation Corp. 664 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Guercio v. Production Automation Corp. 664 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Hilligoss v. Cargill, *385 Inc., , 147 n. 8 (Minn.2002); Davies & Davies Agency, , 131 n. 1 (Minn.1980).
Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc. 649 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 2002
Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc. 649 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 2002
See Davies & Davies Agency, , 131 n. 1 (Minn.1980).
Peggy Rose Revocable Trust v. Eppich 640 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 2002
Peggy Rose Revocable Trust v. Eppich 640 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 2002
See, e.g., Davies & Davies Agency
Midwest Sports Marketing, Inc. v. Hillerich & Bradsby of Canada, Ltd. 552 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Midwest Sports Marketing, Inc. v. Hillerich & Bradsby of Canada, Ltd. 552 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Davies & Robert Buckingham knew before he began his employment that he would be required to sign a noncompetition agreement, but he was not aware of the terms of the agreement.
Ecolab, Inc. v. Gartland 537 N.W.2d 291 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Ecolab, Inc. v. Gartland 537 N.W.2d 291 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
See Davies & (discussing policy reasons for these elements).
Sanborn Manufacturing Co. v. Currie 500 N.W.2d 161 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Sanborn Manufacturing Co. v. Currie 500 N.W.2d 161 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
at 740-41 (distinguishing Davies & Davies Agency, where employee obtained “substantial economic and professional benefits” after signing a contract containing a noncompetition clause); cf. Freeman v. Duluth Clinic, Ltd, 334 N.W,2d 626, 630 (Minn.1983).
Overholt Crop Insurance Service Co. v. Bredeson 437 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Overholt Crop Insurance Service Co. v. Bredeson 437 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Davies & Davies Agency, -31 (Minn.1980).
Webb Publishing Co. v. Fosshage 426 N.W.2d 445 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Webb Publishing Co. v. Fosshage 426 N.W.2d 445 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
“The adequacy of consideration for a noncompetition contract or clause in an ongoing employment relationship should depend on the facts of each case.” Davies & Davies Agency
Satellite Industries, Inc. v. Keeling 396 N.W.2d 635 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Satellite Industries, Inc. v. Keeling 396 N.W.2d 635 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Davies & Davies Agency
Dean Van Horn Consulting Associates, Inc. v. Wold 395 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Dean Van Horn Consulting Associates, Inc. v. Wold 395 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Davies & Davies Agency
Klick v. Crosstown State Bank of Ham Lake, Inc. 372 N.W.2d 85 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Klick v. Crosstown State Bank of Ham Lake, Inc. 372 N.W.2d 85 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Davies & Davies Agency
Freeman v. Duluth Clinic, Ltd. 334 N.W.2d 626 Minn. 1983
Freeman v. Duluth Clinic, Ltd. 334 N.W.2d 626 Minn. 1983
Davies & Davies Agency, -31 (Minn.1980).
Pine River State Bank v. Mettille 333 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1983
Pine River State Bank v. Mettille 333 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1983
Davies & National Recruiters
National Recruiters, Inc. v. Cashman 323 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 1982
National Recruiters, Inc. v. Cashman 323 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 1982
National argues, as did the employer in Davies & Davies Agency, that continued employment is sufficient consideration for a noncompetition agreement even where that agreement has not been bargained for.
Jostens, Inc. v. National Computer System, Inc. 318 N.W.2d 691 Minn. 1982
Jostens, Inc. v. National Computer System, Inc. 318 N.W.2d 691 Minn. 1982
Davies & Davies Agency
Jim W. Miller Construction, Inc. v. Schaefer 298 N.W.2d 455 Minn. 1980
Jim W. Miller Construction, Inc. v. Schaefer 298 N.W.2d 455 Minn. 1980
See Davies & Davies Agency, filed October 17, 1980; Harris v. Bolin, 310 Minn. 391 , Eutectic Welding Alloys Corp. v. West, 281 Minn. 13 , Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co., 270 Minn. 525

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by