Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Roepke v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co., 302 N.W.2d 350.

41 citing documents.

Aaron Carlson Corporation, Minn. 2019
KLC Financial, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
All Finish Concrete, Inc. v. Erickson 899 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
All Finish Concrete, Inc. v. Erickson 899 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Co., (“The practice of piercing the corporate veil is generally a creditor’s remedy used to reach an individual who has used a corporation as an instrument to defraud creditors.”).
Lawrence Leasing, Inc., d/b/a Lawrence Transportation Services v. Northwoods Pallets, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Lawrence Leasing, Inc., d/b/a Lawrence Transportation Services v. Northwoods Pallets, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Co., (describing a “reverse pierce” as “an insider (or someone claiming through him) attempting to pierce the corporate veil from within the corporation”).
Gieseke ex rel. Diversified Water Diversion, Inc. v. IDCA, Inc. 826 N.W.2d 816 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Gieseke ex rel. Diversified Water Diversion, Inc. v. IDCA, Inc. 826 N.W.2d 816 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
WEST BEND MUT. INS. v. Allstate Ins. 776 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 2009
WEST BEND MUT. INS. v. Allstate Ins. 776 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 2009
Co., to support his argument.
Equity Trust Co. Custodian FBO Heather Eisenmenger Ira v. Cole 766 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Equity Trust Co. Custodian FBO Heather Eisenmenger Ira v. Cole 766 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Lilyerd v. Carlson 499 N.W.2d 803 Minn. 1993
Lilyerd v. Carlson 499 N.W.2d 803 Minn. 1993
Hennings v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 438 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Hennings v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 438 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it refused to invoke a because the corporation, in view of the stock ownership, could not be considered White’s “alter ego.” Section II of the policy also provided that coverage does not apply to “bodily injury or property damage arising out of business pursuits * * *.
Lanners v. National Family Insurance Co. 424 N.W.2d 95 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Lanners v. National Family Insurance Co. 424 N.W.2d 95 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
The district court’s conclusion that Lan-ners could stack his insurance policy coverages was based on Lanners’ status as the sole owner of Lanners Construction and the court’s
Miller & Schroeder, Inc. v. Gearman 413 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Motschenbacher v. New Hampshire Insurance Group 402 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Motschenbacher v. New Hampshire Insurance Group 402 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Roepke v. Western Na *123 tional Mutual Insurance Co., -53 (Minn.1981) (corporate veil pierced and coverage stacked on six vehicles owned by the corporation where the decedent was the president and sole shareholder of the named insured corporation, where the vehicles were used as family vehicles, and where neither the decedent nor members of his household owned any ot
Leidall v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. 374 N.W.2d 532 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Leidall v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. 374 N.W.2d 532 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Appellant argues that the trial court could have used a “reverse pierce” theory applied by the Minnesota Supreme Court in Roepke v. Western National Mutual Insurance, Co., in order to find the partnership an insured.
Davidson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. of Bloomington 373 N.W.2d 642 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Davidson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. of Bloomington 373 N.W.2d 642 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
in support of its position that economic loss benefits cannot be stacked under the facts present here.
State Ex Rel. McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc. 370 N.W.2d 844 Minn. 1985
State Ex Rel. McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc. 370 N.W.2d 844 Minn. 1985
Finally, Minnesota recognized the "reverse pierce” (court allowed sole shareholder to "pierce” corporate veil from inside-out to allow stacking of no-fault insurance coverages under policies).
Wills v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 364 N.W.2d 504 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Wills v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 364 N.W.2d 504 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See, Bachman’s (disability benefits); (income loss benefits); (survivors benefits); Record v. Metropolitan Transit Comm’n, (income loss benefits).
Cargill, Inc. v. Hedge 358 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Cargill, Inc. v. Hedge 358 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Wakefield v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co. 344 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1984
Wakefield v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co. 344 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1984
The plaintiff concedes that the reverse pierce of the corporate veil, is based, is inapplicable here.
Kuennen v. Citizens Security Mutual Insurance Company 330 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1983
Kuennen v. Citizens Security Mutual Insurance Company 330 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1983
Rademacher v. Insurance Co. of North America 330 N.W.2d 858 Minn. 1983
Rademacher v. Insurance Co. of North America 330 N.W.2d 858 Minn. 1983
the plaintiffs suggest that a different equitable doctrine, the reverse pierce of the corporate veil, is applicable to extend coverage to the individual members of the religious order as if they were named insureds.
Mickelson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 329 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 1983
Mickelson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 329 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 1983
Metropolitan Transit Commission v. Bachman's 311 N.W.2d 852 Minn. 1981
Metropolitan Transit Commission v. Bachman's 311 N.W.2d 852 Minn. 1981