Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Signal Delivery Service, Inc. v. Brynwood Transfer Co., 288 N.W.2d 707.

56 citing documents.

A Resolution Reaffirming the Issuance of a Cannabis Retail Registration to Jigar Patel, DBA Nature Creation. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
her there is “1) such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion; 2) more than a scintilla of evidence; 3) more than some evidence; 4) more than any evidence; and 5) evidence considered in its entirety.” Brown, d at 505 (quotations omitted); accord Signal Delivery Serv., Inc. v. Brynwood Transfer Co. (Appeal of Signal Delivery Serv., Inc.), Rsrv.
In re Defense and Indemnification of Alexander Vladimir Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re Defense and Indemnification of Alexander Vladimir Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
[We] may conduct an independent examination of the administrative agency’s record and decision and arrive at [our] own conclusions as to the propriety of that determination.” Signal Delivery Serv.
In re the Matter of Ossawinnamakee Road Homeowners v. Commissioner of City of Breezy Point, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Matter of Ossawinnamakee Road Homeowners v. Commissioner of City of Breezy Point, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Duluth Landfill Superior LLC v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Duluth Landfill Superior LLC v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Minn. Ct. App. 2016
[The appellate court] may conduct an independent examination of the administrative agency’s record and decision and arrive at its own conclusions as to the propriety of that determination.” Signal Delivery Serv., see also In re Fin.
In Re the Class a License of North Metro Harness, Inc. 711 N.W.2d 129 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Class a License of North Metro Harness, Inc. 711 N.W.2d 129 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
An agency acts in a quasi-judicial manner “when the commission hears the view of opposing sides presented in the form of written and oral testimony, examines the record and makes findings of fact.” Appeal of Signal Delivery Serv., Inc.
In Re the Financial Responsibility for the Mental Health Services Provided to D.F. 656 N.W.2d 576 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Financial Responsibility for the Mental Health Services Provided to D.F. 656 N.W.2d 576 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In re Signal Delivery Serv., Inc.
Goodnature v. Mower County 558 N.W.2d 19 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Goodnature v. Mower County 558 N.W.2d 19 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
In re Signal Delivery Serv.
In re the Retirement Benefits of Yetka 554 N.W.2d 85 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In re the Retirement Benefits of Yetka 554 N.W.2d 85 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
(applying the statutory standard to a public service commission decision).
Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation Board 550 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1996
Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation Board 550 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1996
ttorney fees, this was an exercise of quasi-judicial powers”); (explaining that a city council's decision to grant a zoning variance or special use permit is quasi-judicial because “the zoning authority is applying specific use standards set by the zoning ordinance to a particular individual use”); Appeal of Signal Delivery Serv., Inc., (directing that an administrative agency acts in a quasi-judicial manner when it "hears the views of opposing sides presented in the form of written and oral tes
Taylor v. City of New London 536 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Taylor v. City of New London 536 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Application of Allers 533 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Application of Allers 533 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Casper v. ITASCA COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES 531 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Casper v. ITASCA COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES 531 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
When reviewing an agency decision, this court is not bound by the district court’s decision and “may conduct an independent examination of the administrative agency’s record and decision and arrive at its own conclusions as to the propriety of that determination.”
Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation Board 520 N.W.2d 13 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation Board 520 N.W.2d 13 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
In re Signal Delivery Serv., Inc.
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council No. 14 v. County of Ramsey 513 N.W.2d 257 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council No. 14 v. County of Ramsey 513 N.W.2d 257 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Judicial review of quasi-judicial decisions is conducted under the “substantial evidence test.”
Kaplan v. Washington County Community Social Services 494 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Kaplan v. Washington County Community Social Services 494 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Inc.), see also Fisher Nut Co. v. Lewis ex rel.
Evenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 489 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Evenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 489 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-34 (Minn.1982); In re Signal Delivery Serv., Inc.
In re Wilson 466 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In re Wilson 466 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See Brinks, Inc. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Comm’n, Signal Delivery Service
In Re the Joint Petition of Space Center Transport 444 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re the Joint Petition of Space Center Transport 444 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Petition of American Freight Systems, Inc. 380 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Petition of American Freight Systems, Inc. 380 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Appeal of Signal Delivery Service, Inc., (citations omitted).
Northern Messenger, Inc. v. Airport Couriers, Inc. 376 N.W.2d 285 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Northern Messenger, Inc. v. Airport Couriers, Inc. 376 N.W.2d 285 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The burden is upon Airport Couriers “of going forward with the evidence and establishing affirmatively the statutory conditions precedent to the granting of the permit.” Signal Delivery Service, Minn.R.
Application of Northwestern Bell Tel. Co. 367 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Application of Northwestern Bell Tel. Co. 367 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Northern Messenger, Inc. v. Airport Couriers, Inc. 359 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Northern Messenger, Inc. v. Airport Couriers, Inc. 359 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See Brinks, (citing Signal Delivery Service, ).
Petition of Peoples Natural Gas Co. 358 N.W.2d 684 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Petition of Peoples Natural Gas Co. 358 N.W.2d 684 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications Partnership 356 N.W.2d 658 Minn. 1984
Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications Partnership 356 N.W.2d 658 Minn. 1984
Sunstar Foods, Inc. v. Uhlendorf Crookston Cattle Co. v. Minnesota Dep’t of Natural Resources, Signal Delivery Service
Department of Natural Resources v. Todd County Hearings Unit 356 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Department of Natural Resources v. Todd County Hearings Unit 356 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Appeal of Signal Delivery Service, Inc.