Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Berry, 309 N.W.2d 777.

60 citing documents.

Moll v. State 351 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Moll v. State 351 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Tribblett, 281 Minn. 505
State v. Amos 347 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 1984
State v. Amos 347 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 1984
White v. State, 309 Minn. 476, 480
State v. McLane 346 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. McLane 346 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Nash 342 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Nash 342 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
the Minnesota Supreme Court has “consistently held that when a defendant waives his right to have the jury instructed regarding lesser included offenses, he is precluded from raising the issue on appeal.” d at 785 .
State v. Kirch 322 N.W.2d 770 Minn. 1982
State v. Kirch 322 N.W.2d 770 Minn. 1982
“In considering the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, the scope of [this court’s] review is limited to the question of whether the [finder of fact], with regard to the presumption of innocence and the state’s burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, could reasonably have found defendant guilty.” (citation omitted).