Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Otis v. Otis, 299 N.W.2d 114.

36 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
The duration of spousal maintenance, including its commencement date, “must bear a reasonable relationship to its underlying basis—to augment the income of the spouse seeking maintenance in order to meet her reasonable financial needs.” Fink, d at 342-43 ().
Marriage of Gales v. Gales 553 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1996
Marriage of Gales v. Gales 553 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1996
Berens v. Berens 443 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Berens v. Berens 443 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Nardini v. Nardini 414 N.W.2d 184 Minn. 1987
Marriage of Nardini v. Nardini 414 N.W.2d 184 Minn. 1987
Senator Reichgott stated that section 518.552 had been amended in 1982 in response to this court’s "to make it very, very clear that in fact we do want permanent spousal maintenance to be an option and that rehabilitative alimony should not in any way preclude the possibility of permanent spousal maintenance."
Marriage of Sand v. Sand 379 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Sand v. Sand 379 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The trial court denied the motion and this court affirmed, stating: The court viewed the original award as one for “rehabilitative maintenance,” and felt that Julia Crampton’s rehabilitative failure should not become Richard Crampton’s responsibility.
Marriage of Peterson v. Peterson 374 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Peterson v. Peterson 374 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Fernandez v. Fernandez 373 N.W.2d 636 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Fernandez v. Fernandez 373 N.W.2d 636 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Elwell v. Elwell 372 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Elwell v. Elwell 372 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Riley v. Riley 369 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Riley v. Riley 369 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Fink v. Fink 366 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Fink v. Fink 366 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of McGowan v. McGowan 363 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of McGowan v. McGowan 363 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Abuzzahab v. Abuzzahab 359 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1984
Marriage of McClelland v. McClelland 359 N.W.2d 7 Minn. 1984
Abuzzahab v. Abuzzahab 359 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1984
Marriage of Montgomery v. Montgomery 358 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Montgomery v. Montgomery 358 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Crampton v. Crampton 356 N.W.2d 768 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Crampton v. Crampton 356 N.W.2d 768 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The court viewed the original award as one for “rehabilitative maintenance,” and felt that Julia Crampton’s rehabilitative failure should not become Richard Crampton’s responsibility.
Marriage of Leach v. Leach 356 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Leach v. Leach 356 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Broms v. Broms 353 N.W.2d 135 Minn. 1984
Marriage of Broms v. Broms 353 N.W.2d 135 Minn. 1984
Marriage of Erlandson v. Erlandson 318 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 1982
Marriage of Erlandson v. Erlandson 318 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 1982
§ 518.552 (1980) and *39 Minn.Stat.
Marriage of DeLa Rosa v. DeLa Rosa 309 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 1981
Marriage of DeLa Rosa v. DeLa Rosa 309 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 1981

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by