Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Wilson v. City of Eagan, 297 N.W.2d 146.

59 citing documents.

Loven v. City of Minneapolis 639 N.W.2d 869 Minn. 2002
Loven v. City of Minneapolis 639 N.W.2d 869 Minn. 2002
-50 (Minn.1980) (holding sovereign immunity should be treated restrictively).
Loven v. City of Minneapolis 626 N.W.2d 198 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Loven v. City of Minneapolis 626 N.W.2d 198 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Moreover, in a suit against a city, the supreme court has stated statutes concerning sovereign immunity “should be read restrictively,” because “one should be liable for the harm one causes.” -50 (Minn.1980).
Soucek v. Banham 524 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Soucek v. Banham 524 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Rowe v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center 472 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 1991
Rowe v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center 472 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 1991
Muehlstedt v. City of Lino Lakes 473 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Muehlstedt v. City of Lino Lakes 473 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
“The weight and force to be given evidence relating to punitive damages is exclusively a jury question.”
Bucko v. First Minnesota Savings Bank 471 N.W.2d 95 Minn. 1991
Bucko v. First Minnesota Savings Bank 471 N.W.2d 95 Minn. 1991
Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. 465 N.W.2d 713 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. 465 N.W.2d 713 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Further, while prejudice to the adverse party is an important consideration in the amendment decision, “merely having to defend against an additional claim or defense” does not constitute sufficient prejudice to preclude amendment.
Rowe v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center 460 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Rowe v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center 460 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Bucko v. First Minnesota Savings Bank, F.S.B. 452 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Bucko v. First Minnesota Savings Bank, F.S.B. 452 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Larson v. State 451 N.W.2d 213 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Larson v. State 451 N.W.2d 213 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp. 448 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp. 448 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
(determining whether punitive damages are appropriate under the particular facts of this case is within the jury’s discretion); (the court may set aside an answer to a special verdict question “only when it is perverse and palpably contrary t
Iowa Concrete Breaking Corp. v. Jewat Trucking, Inc. 444 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Iowa Concrete Breaking Corp. v. Jewat Trucking, Inc. 444 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
“Amendment is liberally permitted and is generally granted absent prejudice to the adverse party.” ().
Kohler v. Fletcher 442 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Kohler v. Fletcher 442 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Appellants’ is misplaced.
Estate of Hartz v. Nelson 437 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Estate of Hartz v. Nelson 437 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Herbst v. Northern States Power Co. 432 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Herbst v. Northern States Power Co. 432 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
ESTATE OF JONES BY BLUME v. Kvamme 430 N.W.2d 188 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
ESTATE OF JONES BY BLUME v. Kvamme 430 N.W.2d 188 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Bogatzki v. Hoffman 430 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Bogatzki v. Hoffman 430 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co. 428 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co. 428 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Robinson v. MacK Trucks, Inc. 426 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Robinson v. MacK Trucks, Inc. 426 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Nachtsheim v. Wartnick 411 N.W.2d 882 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Nachtsheim v. Wartnick 411 N.W.2d 882 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp. 408 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 1987
Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp. 408 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 1987
(“[C]itizens and attorneys are not likely to take action to redress the wrongs where the actual compensatory damages would be low.
Wikert v. Northern Sand and Gravel, Inc. 402 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Wikert v. Northern Sand and Gravel, Inc. 402 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp. 396 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp. 396 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Gits v. Norwest Bank Minneapolis 390 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Gits v. Norwest Bank Minneapolis 390 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Pischke v. Kellen 384 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Pischke v. Kellen 384 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 1986