49956 Precedential Affirmed Processed

State v. Helenbolt

Minnesota Supreme Court · Filed June 7, 1979 · 280 N.W.2d 631

Cited by

State v. Pelovsky 347 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Schmieg 344 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Helenbolt 334 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 1983
State v. Fisher 304 N.W.2d 33 Minn. 1981

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

State v. Webber 262 N.W.2d 157

Opinion text

PER CURIAM. This is a pretrial appeal by the state pursuant to Rule 29.03, subd. 1, Rules of Criminal Procedure, from an order of the district court denying a motion by the state to compel testimony by defendant’s alleged accomplice at defendant’s trial without granting the accomplice immunity from prosecution. The defendant, in a motion to dismiss, argues that the state has failed to demonstrate clearly and unequivocally that the trial court erred in its decision and that the court’s ruling will have a critical impact on the outcome of the trial. Although we deny the motion to dismiss, we agree that the state has not met its burden of demonstrating error, and accordingly we affirm. See, State v. Webber, 262 N.W.2d 157 (Minn.1977). Affirmed.