Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Continental Can Co. Ex Rel. Wilson v. State, 297 N.W.2d 241.
-
Kay v. Peter Motor Co., Inc.
483 N.W.2d 481
Minn. Ct. App. 1992
stated that the liability inquiry should focus on whether the employer knew or should have known about the harassment:
- Huyen v. Driscoll 479 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Huyen v. Driscoll 479 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp. 461 N.W.2d 374 Minn. 1990
- Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp. 461 N.W.2d 374 Minn. 1990
- Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp. 448 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp. 448 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- Graffius v. Control Data Corp. 447 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Graffius v. Control Data Corp. 447 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- In Re the Application for the Discipline of Peters 428 N.W.2d 375 Minn. 1988
-
In Re the Application for the Discipline of Peters
428 N.W.2d 375
Minn. 1988
In Continental Can Co., -49 (Minn.1980), this court construed the Minnesota Human Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination based on sex with respect to the terms or conditions of employment, as imposing liability for sexual harassment which results in an hostile work environment.
- Minneapolis Police Department v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights 425 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1988
- Minneapolis Police Department v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights 425 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1988
- Johnson v. Ramsey County 424 N.W.2d 800 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Johnson v. Ramsey County 424 N.W.2d 800 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Bersie v. Zycad Corp. 417 N.W.2d 288 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Bersie v. Zycad Corp.
417 N.W.2d 288
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
10a(3); see also Continental Can Co.
- Mpls. Police Dept. v. Mpls. Civ. Rights Com'n 402 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Mpls. Police Dept. v. Mpls. Civ. Rights Com'n
402 N.W.2d 125
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(quoting Friend v. Leidinger, 446 F.Supp.
- Minneapolis Police Department v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights 402 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Minneapolis Police Department v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights
402 N.W.2d 125
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
While a complainant may prove discrimination through a co-worker’s, rather than the employer’s, discrimination, an employer may be liable only where the “employer knows or should know of the condition and permits it to continue without attempting to ‘discourage’ it.” (quoting Friend v. Leidinger, 446 F.Supp.
- Bersie v. Zycad Corp. 399 N.W.2d 141 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Bersie v. Zycad Corp. 399 N.W.2d 141 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Klink v. Ramsey County Ex Rel. Zacharias 397 N.W.2d 894 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Klink v. Ramsey County Ex Rel. Zacharias
397 N.W.2d 894
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
10; Continental Can Company
- Shea v. Hanna Mining Co. 397 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Shea v. Hanna Mining Co.
397 N.W.2d 362
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Constructive discharge occurs when “an employee resigns in order to escape intolerable working conditions created by illegal discrimination.” (case involving claims of sex discrimination and harassment under the Minnesota Human Rights Act).
- State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Porter Farms, Inc. 382 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Porter Farms, Inc.
382 N.W.2d 543
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
“[T]he award of damages is committed to the [administrative law judge’s] sound discretion and may be modified only if arbitrary and capricious or if unsupported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole.” (citation omitted).
- Blanding v. Sports & Health Club, Inc. 373 N.W.2d 784 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Blanding v. Sports & Health Club, Inc. 373 N.W.2d 784 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Tretter v. Liquipak International, Inc. 356 N.W.2d 713 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Tretter v. Liquipak International, Inc. 356 N.W.2d 713 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- McNabb v. Cub Foods 352 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1984
- McNabb v. Cub Foods 352 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1984
- Cybyske v. Independent School District No. 196, Rosemount-Apple Valley 347 N.W.2d 256 Minn. 1984
- Sunstar Foods, Inc. v. Uhlendorf 310 N.W.2d 80 Minn. 1981
-
Sunstar Foods, Inc. v. Uhlendorf
310 N.W.2d 80
Minn. 1981
Minn. Stat. § 15.0425 (d)-(f); Bartell v. National Valve & Manufacturing Co., *85 302 Minn. 521, 525