Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Filipi, 297 N.W.2d 275.
- State, Lake Minnetonka Conservation District v. Horner 617 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 2000
- Lorenzen v. Commissioner of Public Safety 594 N.W.2d 552 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- Lorenzen v. Commissioner of Public Safety 594 N.W.2d 552 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- State v. Tilleskjor 488 N.W.2d 327 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-
Distinguished
State v. Tilleskjor
488 N.W.2d 327
Minn. Ct. App. 1992
officers set up a drug purchase through an informant.
- State v. Hummel 483 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 1992
-
State v. Hummel
483 N.W.2d 68
Minn. 1992
“Probable cause to arrest exists when reasonable grounds for suspicion are accompanied by circumstances sufficiently strong in themselves to warrant a cautious person in believing the accused to be guilty of a crime.”
- State v. Buswell 460 N.W.2d 614 Minn. 1990
- Piotrowski v. Commissioner of Public Safety 453 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1990
-
Piotrowski v. Commissioner of Public Safety
453 N.W.2d 689
Minn. 1990
§ 629.37 (1988) [-09 (Minn.1983), -78 (Minn. 1980), and Smith , 253 Minn, at 224, d at 764 ].
- State v. Ailport 413 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
State v. Ailport
413 N.W.2d 140
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
2476 , 53 L.Ed.2d 538 (1977); which govern searches of closed trunks, suitcases and duffel bags conducted solely for purposes of investigating criminal conduct, are applicable to the facts in this matter.
- State v. Stoll 402 N.W.2d 239 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
State v. Stoll
402 N.W.2d 239
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The Minnesota Supreme Court addressed the issue of a search conducted after a valid citizen’s
- State v. Halvorson 356 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Halvorson 356 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Bounds v. Commissioner of Public Safety 353 N.W.2d 659 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Bounds v. Commissioner of Public Safety
353 N.W.2d 659
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
When the issue of an arrest by a peace officer not in his jurisdiction and not in fresh pursuit was raised there, the Supreme Court stated: we noted that a police officer outside his jurisdiction has the arrest powers of a private citizen, such as these may be, in the district where the arrest is made.
- State v. Sellers 350 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
State v. Sellers
350 N.W.2d 460
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Smith v. Hubbard, 253 Minn. 215, 224
- State v. Schinzing 342 N.W.2d 105 Minn. 1983
-
State v. Schinzing
342 N.W.2d 105
Minn. 1983
and hold that everything Zappa did was within the authority of a citizen to do in making a citizen’s arrest.
- State, Department of Public Safety v. Juncewski 308 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 1981
-
State, Department of Public Safety v. Juncewski
308 N.W.2d 316
Minn. 1981
we noted that a police officer outside his jurisdiction has— the arrest powers of a private citizen, such as.
- State v. Ludtke 306 N.W.2d 111 Minn. 1981
- State v. Ludtke 306 N.W.2d 111 Minn. 1981