Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. v. Loescher, 291 N.W.2d 216.

25 citing documents.

Pilot Air Freight, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
P. 65.03; Hubbard Broad., -20 (Minn. 1980).
Nicholas Houchins, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“The collateral source rule provides in general that compensation received from a third party will not diminish recovery against a wrongdoer.” 4 Hubbard Broad ., Inc. v. Loescher
Victoria L. Sloan v. Kelly O'Neil, Regina Sabbia, Kerrie Cathcart, Uptown Realty & Management, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Victoria L. Sloan v. Kelly O'Neil, Regina Sabbia, Kerrie Cathcart, Uptown Realty & Management, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Because its purpose is punitive, this doctrine has generally been applied only to tort cases.” Hubbard Broad.
County of Blue Earth v. Wingen 684 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
County of Blue Earth v. Wingen 684 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Hubbard Broad., -20 (Minn.1980).
VanLandschoot v. Walsh 660 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
VanLandschoot v. Walsh 660 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Under the collateral-source rule, “in general, * * * compensation received from a third party will not diminish recovery against a wrongdoer.” Hubbard Broad.
Smith v. American States Insurance Co. 586 N.W.2d 784 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Smith v. American States Insurance Co. 586 N.W.2d 784 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
One purpose of the rule is punitive: although a plaintiff may receive a double recovery, the rule “requires that a wrongdoer pay for the full extent of the damages he has caused.” Hubbard Broadcasting
Kroning v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. 567 N.W.2d 42 Minn. 1997
Newmech Companies v. Independent School District No. 206 558 N.W.2d 22 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Newmech Companies v. Independent School District No. 206 558 N.W.2d 22 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Hubbard Broadcasting, -20 (Minn.1980) (footnote omitted).
Duluth Steam Cooperative Ass'n v. Ringsred 519 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Duluth Steam Cooperative Ass'n v. Ringsred 519 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
The common law collateral source rule provides that the compensation a plaintiff receives from a third party “will not diminish recovery against a wrongdoer.” Hubbard Broadcasting
Carlson v. Mixell 412 N.W.2d 771 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Carlson v. Mixell 412 N.W.2d 771 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The standard expressed in Hubbard Broadcasting, applies: [T]he underlying purpose of the injunction bond * * * is to require the party seeking the temporary restraining order to pay for the harm caused by its erroneous granting * * *.
Electro-Craft Corp. v. Controlled Motion, Inc. 370 N.W.2d 465 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Electro-Craft Corp. v. Controlled Motion, Inc. 370 N.W.2d 465 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Bio-Line, Inc. v. Wilfley 366 N.W.2d 662 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Bio-Line, Inc. v. Wilfley 366 N.W.2d 662 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
PARADATA OF MINN. v. Fox 356 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
PARADATA OF MINN. v. Fox 356 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See Hubbard Broadcasting, , 220 n. 3 (Minn.1980).
Hueper v. Goodrich 314 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1982
Hueper v. Goodrich 314 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1982
See Hubbard Broadcasting, (purpose of rule is punitive); Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Ins.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by