Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Bettin, 295 N.W.2d 542.

123 citing documents.

State v. Gassler 505 N.W.2d 62 Minn. 1993
(citing Gordon v. United States, 383 F.2d 936 (D.C.Cir.1967), cert.
State v. Clark 486 N.W.2d 166 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Clark 486 N.W.2d 166 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Stallings 474 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Stallings 474 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Lund 474 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Lund 474 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
appellant next argues that the conviction is too remote or “stale” in urging that the defendant must be incarcerated in the interim to preserve the use of the conviction.
Jackson v. State 447 N.W.2d 430 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Jackson v. State 447 N.W.2d 430 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Larsen 442 N.W.2d 840 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Larsen 442 N.W.2d 840 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Skramstad 433 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Skramstad 433 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Bias 419 N.W.2d 480 Minn. 1988
State v. Bias 419 N.W.2d 480 Minn. 1988
State v. Thompson 414 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Thompson 414 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Schwab 409 N.W.2d 876 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Schwab 409 N.W.2d 876 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(where defendant was charged with third-degree criminal sexual conduct, his prior aggravated rape conviction was admissible for impeachment purposes).
Laughnan v. State 404 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Laughnan v. State 404 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Whiteside 400 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Whiteside 400 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Under similar circumstances, the supreme court stated that “[t]he prior conviction of aggravated rape was four years old but defendant was in prison in the interim between the two offenses so it would seem that the offense had not lost any relevance by the passage of time.” (evidence of 12-year-old conviction admitted where charged offenses occurred only months after defendant's release from prison).
State v. Perez 397 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Perez 397 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Norregaard 380 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Norregaard 380 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Henderson 382 N.W.2d 275 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Henderson 382 N.W.2d 275 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Stanifer 382 N.W.2d 213 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Stanifer 382 N.W.2d 213 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Ford 381 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Ford 381 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(use of prior conviction for aggravated robbery when offense charged was aggravated robbery); (use of rape conviction when offense charged was criminal sexual conduct in third degree); Brouillette, (use of prior conviction for criminal sexual conduct in third degree when offense charged was criminal sexual conduct in fourth degree).
State v. Edwards 380 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Edwards 380 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(admission of prior rape conviction to impeach defendant in trial for first and third degree criminal sexual conduct upheld as “indistinguishable” from Brouillette).
State v. Graham 371 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 1985
State v. Graham 371 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 1985
State v. Frank 364 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1985
State v. Frank 364 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1985
State v. Gist 358 N.W.2d 664 Minn. 1984
State v. Gist 358 N.W.2d 664 Minn. 1984
State v. Abbott 356 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 1984
State v. Abbott 356 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 1984
State v. Heidelberger 353 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Heidelberger 353 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Kutchara 350 N.W.2d 924 Minn. 1984
State v. Kutchara 350 N.W.2d 924 Minn. 1984
State v. Ward 349 N.W.2d 294 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Ward 349 N.W.2d 294 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See, (prior first degree murder conviction, prosecution for second-degree murder); (both aggravated robbery); (both sexual offenses); (both ag *297 gravated assault); (both sexual offenses).
State v. Amos 347 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 1984