Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Berland v. Special School District No. 1, Minneapolis, 314 N.W.2d 809.

40 citing documents.

Shaner v. Independent School District No. 2884 604 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Shaner v. Independent School District No. 2884 604 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Washington v. Independent School District No. 625 590 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Washington v. Independent School District No. 625 590 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Flaherty v. Independent School District No. 2144 577 N.W.2d 229 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Flaherty v. Independent School District No. 2144 577 N.W.2d 229 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Cloud v. Independent School District No. 38 508 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Cloud v. Independent School District No. 38 508 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Krueth v. Independent School District No. 38 496 N.W.2d 829 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Krueth v. Independent School District No. 38 496 N.W.2d 829 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
No. 1, allows consideration of special qualifications for grant-funded positions.
Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11 459 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 1990
Harms v. Independent School District No. 300 450 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 1990
Harms v. Independent School District No. 300 450 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 1990
No. 1, , 817 *575 (Minn.1981) (emphasis added and footnote omitted), we stated: These provisions set out in detail the rights of terminated teachers to be reinstated in order of seniority to the positions they formerly held or to other available positions “in fields in which they are licensed.” * * * [Sjection * * * 125.12 *
Harms v. Independent School District No. 300 441 N.W.2d 522 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Harms v. Independent School District No. 300 441 N.W.2d 522 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Berland v. Special School District No. 1
Sherek v. Independent School District No. 699 435 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Sherek v. Independent School District No. 699 435 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Berland v. Special School District No. 1, Minneapolis
Westgard v. Independent School District No. 745 400 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Westgard v. Independent School District No. 745 400 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Berland v. Special School District No. 1
State Ex Rel. Buys v. Independent School District No. 891 398 N.W.2d 622 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Beste v. Independent School District No. 697 398 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Beste v. Independent School District No. 697 398 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
No. 1, -812 (Minn.1981), reh’g denied (March 23, 1982).
State Ex Rel. Buys v. Independent School District No. 891 398 N.W.2d 622 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Berland v. Special School District No. 1, (a § 125.-17 case in which the supreme court referred to § 125.12 cases as “[representing] this court’s view of the legislative intent to protect tenured teachers, either in cities of the first class or those not of the first class.”) In Brandhorst , the school district retained ten teachers who were
Evans v. Independent School District No. 281 396 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Evans v. Independent School District No. 281 396 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Berland v. Special School District No. 1
Strand v. Special School District No. 1 392 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1986
Strand v. Special School District No. 1 392 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1986
85 , “that [position] of a teacher at the level and in the curricula for which he is certified ...,” Hendrickson v. Independent School District No. 319, 303 Minn. 423, 426 , and “that subject area and grade level for which the teacher is qualified as evidenced by licensure from the State of Minnesota,” Berland v. Special School District No. 1
Blank v. Independent School District No. 16 393 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1986
Sweeney v. Special School District No. 1 368 N.W.2d 288 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Sweeney v. Special School District No. 1 368 N.W.2d 288 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Basing their decision on the rationale of an earlier case, Berland v. Special School District No. 1, et al., the court held that subd.
State Ex Rel. Haak v. Board of Education of Independent School District No. 625 367 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1985
State Ex Rel. Haak v. Board of Education of Independent School District No. 625 367 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1985
No. 1, and McManus, , might be extended to administrative staff is difficult to discuss in the abstract.
Strand v. Special School District No. 1 361 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Strand v. Special School District No. 1 361 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The legislative purpose behind the first class city Teacher Tenure Act was to promote “stability, certainty, and permanency of employment on the part of those who had shown by educational attainment and by probationary trial their fitness for the teaching profession.” Berland v. Special School District No. 1, -12 (Minn.1981) (quoting McSherry v. City of St.
Ruter v. Independent School District No. 347 364 N.W.2d 823 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Ruter v. Independent School District No. 347 364 N.W.2d 823 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
If the terminated teacher has greater seniority than a teacher retained in a department for which the terminated teacher is qualified, the teacher with less seniority will be “bumped.” Berland v. Special School District No. 1, (emphasis supplied).
Duluth Federation of Teachers, Local 692 v. Independent School District No. 709 361 N.W.2d 834 Minn. 1985
Duluth Federation of Teachers, Local 692 v. Independent School District No. 709 361 N.W.2d 834 Minn. 1985
No. 1, and McManus v. Independent School Dist.
McManus v. Independent School District No. 625 321 N.W.2d 891 Minn. 1982
McManus v. Independent School District No. 625 321 N.W.2d 891 Minn. 1982
We find this case is controlled by our interpretation of the same statute in Berland v. Special School District No. 1, et al.