Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Matter of Welfare of Mullins, 298 N.W.2d 56.

38 citing documents.

Anderson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. 696 924 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Anderson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. 696 924 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See In re Welfare of Mullins , , 61 n.7 (Minn. 1980) (noting that standing *923 can be challenged at any time).
In Re the Estate of Jotham 722 N.W.2d 447 Minn. 2006
In Re the Estate of Jotham 722 N.W.2d 447 Minn. 2006
In re Petition for Improvement of County Ditch, No. 86, Branch 1, , 61 n. 7 (Minn.1980).
Marriage of Kilpatrick v. Kilpatrick 673 N.W.2d 528 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Marriage of Kilpatrick v. Kilpatrick 673 N.W.2d 528 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Lucio v. School Board of Independent School District No. 625 574 N.W.2d 737 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Lucio v. School Board of Independent School District No. 625 574 N.W.2d 737 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Nodes 538 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Nodes 538 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Cochrane v. Tudor Oaks Condominium Project 529 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Cochrane v. Tudor Oaks Condominium Project 529 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
In re Welfare of Mullins , , 61 n. 7 (Minn. 1980).
Matter of Kellor 520 N.W.2d 9 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Matter of Kellor 520 N.W.2d 9 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-61 (Minn.1980) (holding an out-of-state court’s placement of a child in Minnesota pursuant to Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act does not affect the out-of-state court’s jurisdiction over the child).
Runia v. Marguth Agency, Inc. 437 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1989
Runia v. Marguth Agency, Inc. 437 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1989
n. 7 (Minn.1980); Izaak Walton League of America Endowment, Inc. v. State Dep't of Natural Resources, 312 Minn. 587, 589
In Re the Marriage of Schmidt 436 N.W.2d 99 Minn. 1989
In Re the Marriage of Schmidt 436 N.W.2d 99 Minn. 1989
See, (trial court directed to contact authorities in California relative to custody issue).
Marriage of Sawle v. Nicholson 408 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Sawle v. Nicholson 408 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re Custody of EAQD 405 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Simpson v. Walker 405 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re Custody of EAQD 405 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Simpson v. Walker 405 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bergh v. Bergh 387 N.W.2d 213 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bergh v. Bergh 387 N.W.2d 213 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Schoeberlein v. Rohlfing 383 N.W.2d 386 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Schoeberlein v. Rohlfing 383 N.W.2d 386 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
§ 518A (1984) is “to assure informed decision making by restricting choice of forum to only those possessing optimum access to information about the child.” (emphasis added).
Marriage of Beier v. Beier 371 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Beier v. Beier 371 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Snow v. Snow 369 N.W.2d 581 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Snow v. Snow 369 N.W.2d 581 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
As stated by the Minnesota Supreme Court in : The issuance of a divorce decree governing custody in one state followed by the ■ move of the custodial parent to another state results in the new place of residence becoming the child’s “home state” for the purposes of the Act [UCCJA].
State Ex Rel. McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc. 370 N.W.2d 844 Minn. 1985
State Ex Rel. McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc. 370 N.W.2d 844 Minn. 1985
However, an objection to want of “standing” goes to the existence of a cause of action, is jurisdictional, and may be raised at any time, , 61 n. 7 (Minn.1980).
Marriage of Derence v. Derence 363 N.W.2d 86 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Derence v. Derence 363 N.W.2d 86 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Landa v. Norris 313 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 1981
Landa v. Norris 313 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 1981
Although a different procedural posture was developed in we there noted with approval the presumption that a court exercising primary jurisdiction would not knowingly render a final decision in the absence of a complete record.