Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Petty v. Allstate Insurance Co., 290 N.W.2d 763.

25 citing documents.

Founders Insurance Company v. James Yates 876 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Founders Insurance Company v. James Yates 876 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
2, a licensed company agrees to provide basic economic loss coverages, [n]otwithstanding any contrary provision in the original policy so long as the insured vehicle is in Minnesota.” (quotations omitted).
Warthan v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 592 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Warthan v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 592 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Anderson v. Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Ass'n 520 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Rydberg v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 453 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Rydberg v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 453 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
The insurer’s obligation to make payments to its Wisconsin policyholder under the Minnesota No-Fault Act “arises from the duties imposed upon it for the privilege of doing business in Minnesota, not its private contract with the insured.”
Peck v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 404 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Peck v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 404 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
the Minnesota Supreme Court established a nonresident operating an insured vehicle in Minnesota is entitled to stack basic economic loss coverages for all the nonresident’s insured vehicles, regardless of whether the other vehicles were within the state at the time of the accident.
Regie De L'Assurance Automobile Du Quebec v. Jensen 389 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Regie De L'Assurance Automobile Du Quebec v. Jensen 389 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Sawyer v. Midland Insurance Co. 383 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Sawyer v. Midland Insurance Co. 383 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(obligation to provide basic economic loss benefits and to allow stacking of such benefits arises from duties imposed on insurance company under certification statute, Minn.Stat.
Western National Mutual Insurance Co. v. State Farm Insurance Co. 374 N.W.2d 441 Minn. 1985
Western National Mutual Insurance Co. v. State Farm Insurance Co. 374 N.W.2d 441 Minn. 1985
Co., limited construction of Minnesota’s “certification” statute, Minn. Stat. § 65B.50 (1982).
Aid Insurance Co. v. Continental Western Insurance Co. 357 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Aid Insurance Co. v. Continental Western Insurance Co. 357 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Co., we held an insurer licensed to do business in Minnesota is required to afford basic economic loss benefits to a non-resident policyholder on an accident that occurs in Minnesota even though her vehicle was not present in Minnesota at the time of the accident.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Feldman 359 N.W.2d 57 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Feldman 359 N.W.2d 57 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
§ 65B.50 (1982) and the Minnesota Supreme Court’s held that an insurer licensed to do business in Minnesota had to afford basic economic loss benefits to a nonresident policyholder on an accident occurring in Minnesota even though the policyholder’s vehicle was not present in Minnesota at the time of the accident.
Burgie v. League General Insurance Co. 355 N.W.2d 466 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Burgie v. League General Insurance Co. 355 N.W.2d 466 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Co., although declining to rule on this issue {see, footnote 1, d at 765 ), the Supreme Court, nevertheless, states: In subd.
Western National Mutual Insurance Co. v. State Farm Insurance 353 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Western National Mutual Insurance Co. v. State Farm Insurance 353 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hedin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 351 N.W.2d 407 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hedin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 351 N.W.2d 407 Minn. Ct. App. 1984