Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Wiese v. Wiese, 295 N.W.2d 371.

61 citing documents.

Moylan v. Moylan 384 N.W.2d 859 Minn. 1986
It is well established that the decision to modify a child support order lies in the broad and sound discretion of the trial court, and an appellate court will reverse for an abuse of that discretion only where it finds a “clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the facts on record.”
In Re the Marriage of Abuzzahab v. Abuzzahab 359 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State on Behalf of Johnson v. Howell 359 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Marriage of Abuzzahab v. Abuzzahab 359 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State on Behalf of Johnson v. Howell 359 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
An award of child support payments may only be modified upon a showing of a “substantial change of circumstances from those existing at the time of the dissolution or * * * at the time the award was last modified.” Minn. Stat. § 518.64 , subd.
Kleinhuizen v. Kleinhuizen 354 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Kleinhuizen v. Kleinhuizen 354 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Judicial interpretation of § 518.64 and its predecessors has established that modification of a child support award is appropriate “only upon clear proof of facts showing a substantial change of circumstances from those existing at the time of the dissolution * *
Claybaugh v. Claybaugh 312 N.W.2d 447 Minn. 1981
Claybaugh v. Claybaugh 312 N.W.2d 447 Minn. 1981
Lemley v. Lemley, 290 Minn. 525
Bebeau v. Mart 310 N.W.2d 465 Minn. 1981
Bebeau v. Mart 310 N.W.2d 465 Minn. 1981