Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Loebach, 310 N.W.2d 58.
- State v. Hannuksela 452 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1990
- State v. Slowinski 450 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1990
- State v. Slowinski 450 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1990
- State v. Thieman 439 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1989
- State v. Thieman 439 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1989
- State v. Watson 433 N.W.2d 110 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- State v. Watson 433 N.W.2d 110 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- State v. Jurgens 424 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- State v. Jurgens 424 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- State v. Miggler 419 N.W.2d 81 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
State v. Miggler
419 N.W.2d 81
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(battering-parent profile inadmissible to show defendant abused baby unless defendant puts character in issue).
- State v. Axford 409 N.W.2d 893 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
State v. Axford
409 N.W.2d 893
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
citing Lowe v. United States, 389 F.2d 108 (8th Cir.1968), cert.
- State v. Byman 410 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Byman 410 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Garden 404 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Garden 404 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Wanglie v. State 398 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Wanglie v. State 398 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Daby 394 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Daby 394 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Hall 392 N.W.2d 285 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Hall 392 N.W.2d 285 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Aligah v. State 394 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Aligah v. State 394 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Patten v. State 378 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Patten v. State 378 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Gerring 378 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Gerring 378 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. True 378 N.W.2d 45 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. True 378 N.W.2d 45 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Nylund 371 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
State v. Nylund
371 N.W.2d 35
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
397 n. 2 (Minn.1984) (risk is considerable that the jury will use evidence of prior conviction for driving while under the influence in determining whether the defendant *38 is guilty of the charged act of driving while under the influence).
- State v. Cermak 365 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 1985
-
State v. Cermak
365 N.W.2d 238
Minn. 1985
(barring admission in child abuse case of evidence of battering parent syndrome, including evidence that the defendant, like most battering parents, was himself abused as a child).
- State v. Daby 359 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Daby 359 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Jahnke 353 N.W.2d 606 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Jahnke 353 N.W.2d 606 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Jackson 346 N.W.2d 634 Minn. 1984
-
State v. Jackson
346 N.W.2d 634
Minn. 1984
we again rejected a “merger doctrine” argument, noting that it “is an argument which has been made countless times by other defendants and rejected each time by this court.” Presumably the legislature was aware of these “countless” cases when it reclassified felony murder in 1981, changing it from thi
- State v. Udstuen 345 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1984
-
State v. Udstuen
345 N.W.2d 766
Minn. 1984
(dealing with use of battering parents syndrome evidence against a defendant charged with child abuse).
- State v. Saldana 324 N.W.2d 227 Minn. 1982
- State v. McGee 324 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 1982
-
State v. Saldana
324 N.W.2d 227
Minn. 1982
As we stated in refusing to permit introduction of “battering parent” syndrome, the evidence may not be introduced “until further evidence of the scientific accuracy and reliability of syndrome or profile diagnoses can be established.”
- State v. Durfee 322 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 1982
-
State v. Durfee
322 N.W.2d 778
Minn. 1982
that until the accused had put his character in evidence, it was error for the state to present the “battering parent syndrome” followed by specific evidence that the accused “fit the pattern.” No attempt was made to do that in this ease.
- State v. Cox 322 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1982
- State v. Cox 322 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1982