Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Iverson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 295 N.W.2d 573.

40 citing documents.

Latterell v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co. 801 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 2011
Latterell v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co. 801 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 2011
Co., (invalidating a policy exclusion preventing recovery of basic economic loss benefits when the insured was injured while using an uninsured automobile); see also Malmin v. Minn. Mut.
Auto Owners Insurance Co. v. Perry 730 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Auto Owners Insurance Co. v. Perry 730 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Co., School Sisters of Notre Dame v. State Farm Mut.
American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 546 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 546 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Co., (voiding exclusion that precluded recovery of no-fault benefits because injuries arose out of use of vehicle that was owned, but not insured, by policyholder).
Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. v. Willey 481 N.W.2d 146 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. v. Willey 481 N.W.2d 146 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Meister v. Western National Mutual Insurance 479 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1992
Meister v. Western National Mutual Insurance 479 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1992
Co., (uninsured motorist .coverage).
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Harvey 474 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Harvey 474 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Garrick v. Northland Insurance Co. 460 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Garrick v. Northland Insurance Co. 460 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Vieths v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 441 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Vieths v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 441 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Laffen v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 429 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Laffen v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 429 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Petrich Ex Rel. Lee v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. 427 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1988
Petrich Ex Rel. Lee v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. 427 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1988
Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. v. VanDoren 424 N.W.2d 791 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. v. VanDoren 424 N.W.2d 791 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Co., and Nygaard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
Petrich Ex Rel. Lee v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. 414 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Petrich Ex Rel. Lee v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. 414 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Co., upheld the Nygaard rationale and applied it to questions concerning the No-Fault Act.
Kruse v. Minnesota Automobile Assigned Claims Bureau 371 N.W.2d 602 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kruse v. Minnesota Automobile Assigned Claims Bureau 371 N.W.2d 602 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
“One of the [No-Fault] Act’s basic purposes was to achieve comprehensive indemnity for economic losses incurred in vehicle accidents.”
Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corp. 354 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corp. 354 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Dahle v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Insurance Co. 352 N.W.2d 397 Minn. 1984
Dahle v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Insurance Co. 352 N.W.2d 397 Minn. 1984
Co., Kaysen v. Federal Ins.
Mickelson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 329 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 1983
Mickelson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 329 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 1983
it was recognized that if the victim of a fatal automobile accident was not an insured under any policy of insurance affording basic economic loss benefits, the decedent’s failure to obtain insurance on his owned vehicle would preclude his widow from participating in the assigned claims plan.
American Motorist Insurance Co. v. Sarvela 327 N.W.2d 77 Minn. 1982
American Motorist Insurance Co. v. Sarvela 327 N.W.2d 77 Minn. 1982
1002 , 62 L.Ed.2d 745 (1980)
Balderrama v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. 324 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1982
Balderrama v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. 324 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1982
Rosenberger v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 309 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1981
Rosenberger v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 309 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1981
American Family’s argument that Rosen-berger’s failure to obtain insurance is a
Toomey Ex Rel. Burtson v. Krone 306 N.W.2d 549 Minn. 1981
Toomey Ex Rel. Burtson v. Krone 306 N.W.2d 549 Minn. 1981
This court has recently decided a