Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Berndt v. Berndt, 292 N.W.2d 1.

63 citing documents.

Sefkow v. Sefkow 372 N.W.2d 37 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Meyer v. Meyer 375 N.W.2d 820 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Meyer v. Meyer 375 N.W.2d 820 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Schultz v. Schultz 358 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Schultz v. Schultz 358 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Pikula v. Pikula 349 N.W.2d 322 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Pikula v. Pikula 349 N.W.2d 322 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Kotila v. Kotila 351 N.W.2d 661 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Kotila v. Kotila 351 N.W.2d 661 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
for example, our Supreme Court stated: 1.
Marriage of Ebnet v. Ebnet 347 N.W.2d 840 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Ebnet v. Ebnet 347 N.W.2d 840 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Weatherly v. Weatherly 330 N.W.2d 890 Minn. 1983
Weatherly v. Weatherly 330 N.W.2d 890 Minn. 1983
This conclusion was inappropriate, first because job instability, if leaving low-paying part-time jobs was that, has no bearing on appellant’s ability to care for her son, and second because her record cannot be compared to respondent’