Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Space Center, Inc. v. 451 CORP., 298 N.W.2d 443.

26 citing documents.

Chase Rovere v. Clifford Ling Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Chase Rovere v. Clifford Ling Minn. Ct. App. 2024
However, “[t]he refusal to perform must in effect be an unqualified renunciation or repudiation of the contract.” Space Ctr., Inc. v. 451 Corp., (quoting Matteson v. U.S. & Can.
A20-0744 Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Space Ctr., Inc. v. 451 Corp., (“ Where a party to an executory contract places itself in a position where it cannot perform the contract, or where the party otherwise prevents performance of the contract, the other contracting party may treat the contract as anticipatorily breached.”); (Minn.
33 City Center Holding LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Space Ctr., Inc. v. 451 C orp.
Western National Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Space Ctr., Inc. v. 451 Corp.
Casimir Robert Krithers v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Victor Legatt v. Dennis Legatt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Victor Legatt v. Dennis Legatt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Space Ctr., Inc. v. 451 Corp.
Sterling State Bank v. Maas Commercial Properties, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Sterling State Bank v. Maas Commercial Properties, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
prior total breach,” Space Ctr., Inc. v. 451 Corp., accord Associated Cinemas of Am.
State Ex Rel. Friends of the Riverfront v. City of Minneapolis 751 N.W.2d 586 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State Ex Rel. Friends of the Riverfront v. City of Minneapolis 751 N.W.2d 586 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
“An anticipatory breach by repudiation occurs where a vendor cannot possibly perform and where by its conduct it demonstrates an unequivocal intent not to perform.” Space Ctr., Inc. v. 151 Corp.
Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd. 680 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 2004
Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd. 680 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 2004
Co., which allowed recovery of attorney fees against a comprehensive general liability carrier that had breached the agreement by denying coverage, and Space Center, Inc. v. 451 Corp., stating the general proposition that “a repudiating party cannot set up the other party’s subsequent nonperformance or a breach to avoid liability for its own prior total breach.”).
Home Insurance Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance of Pittsburgh 658 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 2003
Home Insurance Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance of Pittsburgh 658 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 2003
See Space Center, Inc. v. 451 Corp., (noting that “a repudiating party cannot set up the other party’s subsequent nonperformance or a breach to avoid liability for its own prior total breach”).
Carlson Real Estate Co. v. Soltan 549 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Carlson Real Estate Co. v. Soltan 549 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
See Space Ctr, Inc. v. 451 Corp., (first breaching party cannot use other party’s subsequent breach to avoid liability); 17A C.J.S.
In Re Hennepin County 1986 Recycling Bond Litigation 540 N.W.2d 494 Minn. 1995
In Re Hennepin County 1986 Recycling Bond Litigation 540 N.W.2d 494 Minn. 1995
Our conclusion is consistent with our opinion in Space Center, Inc. v. 451 Corp., where this court addressed the issue of whether a party to a contract could avoid performance by affirmatively blocking the happening of a condition precedent.
Bell v. Olson 424 N.W.2d 829 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Bell v. Olson 424 N.W.2d 829 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See Space Center, Inc. v. 451 Corp., -51 (Minn.1980).
Century 21-Birdsell Realty, Inc. v. Hiebel 379 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Century 21-Birdsell Realty, Inc. v. Hiebel 379 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Space Center, Inc. v. 451 Corporation, -51 (Minn.1980) (sellers who lost title had no intention of selling).
Furlev Sales & Associates, Inc. v. North American Automotive Warehouse, Inc. 325 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1982
Furlev Sales & Associates, Inc. v. North American Automotive Warehouse, Inc. 325 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1982
7 Minnesota addressed the issue in Space Center, Inc. v. 451 Corporation

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by