Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Discipline of Shaw, 298 N.W.2d 133.

40 citing documents.

In re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct in Panel Case No. 44387 932 N.W.2d 310 Minn. 2019
In re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct in Panel Case No. 44387 932 N.W.2d 310 Minn. 2019
" In re Shaw , , 135 (Minn. 1980) (emphasis added).
In re Disciplinary Action Against Montez 812 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 2012
In re Disciplinary Action Against Montez 812 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 2012
inn.2001) (); -71 (Minn.1996) (explaining that lawyers are “charged with the knowledge that [they] must maintain a separate account and adequate records,” and imposing discipline even where an attorney’s trust account violations were not undertaken with intent to defraud the client) ().
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Rooney 709 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 2006
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Rooney 709 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 2006
See, -11 (Minn.1986); 262 (Minn.1985); -35 (Minn.1980).
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Ganley 549 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1996
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Ganley 549 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1996
This court held in that “[ejvery lawyer is * * * charged with the knowledge that he must maintain a separate account and adequate records.” Id.
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Kinnunen 502 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1993
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Kinnunen 502 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1993
Attorneys in *775 this state are charged with knowledge of the requirements regulating the handling of client funds, and have been advised that “misuse of trust accounts * * * will * * * almost invariably result in lengthy suspension at the very least and disbarment at worst.”
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Stockman 502 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 1993
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Stockman 502 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 1993
Unlike where the commingling was a single event and lasted only a short time, here the violations were continuous and repeated.
In Re Disciplinary Action Against LaChapelle 491 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1992
In Re Disciplinary Action Against LaChapelle 491 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1992
“Every lawyer is * * * charged with the knowledge that he must maintain a separate account and adequate records.”
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Olsen 487 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1992
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Olsen 487 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1992
(Minn.1988) (attorney’s whole life indicated care and concern for those less privileged, extensive pro bono work performed had a deleterious effect on both his professional and family finances); , 15 (Minn.1984) (attorney performed significant pro bono work, single misappropriation of $7,000-$9,000 an isolated incident in an otherwise ethical practice); (conversion consisted of a single event, temporary misuse of $10,000 only for a short time and full restitution made).
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Walker 461 N.W.2d 219 Minn. 1990
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Walker 461 N.W.2d 219 Minn. 1990
(public reprimand sufficient where commingling was single event, lasted short time, with restitution).
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Pyles 421 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1988
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Pyles 421 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1988
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Sampson 408 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1987
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Sampson 408 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1987
Matter of Discipline of Shaw 396 N.W.2d 573 Minn. 1986
Matter of Discipline of Shaw 396 N.W.2d 573 Minn. 1986
Matter of Discipline of Beal 374 N.W.2d 715 Minn. 1985
Matter of Discipline of Beal 374 N.W.2d 715 Minn. 1985
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Simonson 365 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1985
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Simonson 365 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1985
Matter of Disciplinary Action Against Franke 345 N.W.2d 224 Minn. 1984
Matter of Disciplinary Action Against Franke 345 N.W.2d 224 Minn. 1984
Petition of Disciplinary Action Against Daffer 344 N.W.2d 382 Minn. 1984
Petition of Disciplinary Action Against Daffer 344 N.W.2d 382 Minn. 1984
See Olkon, d at 196; Scallen, d at 841-42 ; (case involving misappropriation of client’s funds — conduct which often results in disbarment).
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Lee 334 N.W.2d 163 Minn. 1983
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Lee 334 N.W.2d 163 Minn. 1983
In the court addressed the issue of false certification of compliance with DR 9-103.
Matter of Austin 333 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1983
Matter of Austin 333 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1983
For instance, in an attorney was publicly reprimanded, placed on supervised probation for a minimum of 3 years, and fined $5,000 for commingling and conversion of client funds, failure to maintain a trust account and false certification to the supreme court of proper recordkeeping.
In Re the Discipline of Serstock 316 N.W.2d 559 Minn. 1982
Matter of Discipline of Fling 316 N.W.2d 556 Minn. 1982
Matter of Discipline of Fling 316 N.W.2d 556 Minn. 1982
In Re the Discipline of Serstock 316 N.W.2d 559 Minn. 1982
Unlike where the commingling was a single event and lasted only a short time, here the violations were continuous and repeated.