Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Minnesota-Iowa Television Co. v. Watonwan T v. Improvement Ass'n, 294 N.W.2d 297.

82 citing documents.

ROA Rochester v. City of Byron Minn. Ct. App. 2024
ROA Rochester v. City of Byron Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Ass’n, (determining that the doctrine of unclean hands is an affirmative defense that must be brought in a party’s pleadings).
Allison Catherine Buckner, Minn. 2023
Paul Stepnes v. Beth Trautman, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Ass’n, 305 (Minn. 1980) (declining to consider on appeal respondent’s affirmative defenses not raised in pleadings or considered by district court); Kilton v. Richard G. Nadler & Assocs., (concluding no error in district court requiring defendant to proceed by general denial a
TMT Management Group, LLC, et al v. U.S. Bank National Association, et al., Wilbur Tate, United Credit Recovery, … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Abdiaziz H. Hirsi v. ARCH Language Network, Inc. d/b/a ARCH Language, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Minn.-Iowa Television Co. v. Watonwan TV Improvement Ass’n, (hol ding that “conscious and delib erate breach” is not an independent tort); Olson, d at 388 (holding that refusal to pay an amount owed under an insurance contract was not fraud justifying an award o f punitive damages).
EverStar, LLC v. Aitkin County Board of Commissioners Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Improvement Ass’n, (“[T]he exemption from antitrust laws for government approved activities has generally been limited to activities either required or specifically permitted by the government.”).
Siewert v. Northern States Power Co. 793 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 2011
Siewert v. Northern States Power Co. 793 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 2011
(internal quotations omitted).
Driscoll v. STANDARD HARDWARE, INC. 785 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Driscoll v. STANDARD HARDWARE, INC. 785 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Improvement Assoc., In re Silicone Implant Ins.
Hoffman v. Northern States Power Co. 764 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 2009
Hoffman v. Northern States Power Co. 764 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 2009
Improvement Ass’n, (concluding that the court is competent to adjudicate whether a contract between a regulated TV station and a nonprofit organization violates state antitrust law).
Lorix v. Crompton Corp. 736 N.W.2d 619 Minn. 2007
Lorix v. Crompton Corp. 736 N.W.2d 619 Minn. 2007
Loppe v. Steiner 699 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Loppe v. Steiner 699 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Improvement Ass’n, Septran, Inc. v. Indep.
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 652 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 652 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Improvement Ass’n, (stating that statute “leaves intact the caselaw prohibition against punitive damages in contract actions”).
Jensen v. Walsh 623 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 2001
Jensen v. Walsh 623 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 2001
Improvement Ass’n, -11 (Minn.1980).
Minnesota Twins Partnership v. State Ex Rel. Hatch 592 N.W.2d 847 Minn. 1999
Minnesota Twins Partnership v. State Ex Rel. Hatch 592 N.W.2d 847 Minn. 1999
Septran, Inc. v. Independent School District No. 271, Bloomington, Minnesota 555 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Septran, Inc. v. Independent School District No. 271, Bloomington, Minnesota 555 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Molenaar v. United Cattle Co. 553 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Molenaar v. United Cattle Co. 553 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Soucek v. Banham 524 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Mrozka v. Archdiocese of St. Paul & Mpls. 482 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Mrozka v. Archdiocese of St. Paul & Mpls. 482 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Improvement Ass’n, -11 (Minn.1980); Wild v. Rarig, 302 Minn. 419, 440-42 , -90 *811 (1975), cert.
Muehlstedt v. City of Lino Lakes 473 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Muehlstedt v. City of Lino Lakes 473 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See Minnesota-Iowa Television Co. v. Watonwan T. V. Improvement Ass’n, -11 (Minn.1980).
Hough Transit, Ltd. v. National Farmers Organization 472 N.W.2d 358 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Hough Transit, Ltd. v. National Farmers Organization 472 N.W.2d 358 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Minnesota-Iowa Television Co. v. Watonwan T. V. Improvement Ass’n
Uselman v. Uselman 464 N.W.2d 130 Minn. 1990
Uselman v. Uselman 464 N.W.2d 130 Minn. 1990
City of Willmar Municipal Utilities Commission v. Kandiyohi Cooperative Electric Power Ass'n 452 N.W.2d 699 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
City of Willmar Municipal Utilities Commission v. Kandiyohi Cooperative Electric Power Ass'n 452 N.W.2d 699 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Improvement Association, (citations omitted).
Nhep v. Roisen 446 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Nhep v. Roisen 446 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Gendreau v. Foremost Insurance Co. 423 N.W.2d 712 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Gendreau v. Foremost Insurance Co. 423 N.W.2d 712 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Anderson v. Medtronic, Inc.
Brevik v. Kite Painting, Inc. 416 N.W.2d 714 Minn. 1987
Brevik v. Kite Painting, Inc. 416 N.W.2d 714 Minn. 1987
Improvement Ass’n, quoting Far East Conference v. United States, 342 U.S. 570, 574 , 72 S.Ct.
Nachtsheim v. Wartnick 411 N.W.2d 882 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Nachtsheim v. Wartnick 411 N.W.2d 882 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Improvement Association, -11 (Minn.1980).
Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp. 408 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 1987
Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp. 408 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 1987
Wilson v. Saetre 393 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Wilson v. Saetre 393 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Improvement Association, the court specifically stated section 549.21 applies only to a party or attorney acting in bad faith as to an issue in litigation.