Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Krug v. Independent School District No. 16, 293 N.W.2d 26.

25 citing documents.

Tokvan Ly v. Jodi Harpstead, Minnesota Commissioner of Human Services 7 N.W.3d 560 Minn. 2024
Tokvan Ly v. Jodi Harpstead, Minnesota Commissioner of Human Services 7 N.W.3d 560 Minn. 2024
Stern 1011 First Street South, LLC, et al., Minn. 2022
No. 16 , (involving close question of whether amended order raised a new, previously unappealable issue and whether the appeal period ran from the original order or the amended order).
In Re the Welfare of J.R. 655 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2003
In Re the Welfare of J.R. 655 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2003
No. 16, *4 -37 (Minn.1979); E.C.I.
Flaherty v. Independent School District No. 2144 577 N.W.2d 229 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Flaherty v. Independent School District No. 2144 577 N.W.2d 229 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Cloud v. Independent School District No. 38 508 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Cloud v. Independent School District No. 38 508 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
No. 16, (because a school nurse was required to hold a license, she was a teacher pursuant to Minn.Stat.
In Re the Demotion of Dillenberger 486 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re the Demotion of Dillenberger 486 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Weikle v. Weikle 403 N.W.2d 682 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Weikle v. Weikle 403 N.W.2d 682 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Our decision is shaped by the same reason recognized in Krug v. Independent School District No. 16, : [I]t would seem unjust to dismiss [Krug’s] appeal when the record indicates that all her actions were taken promptly and with the intent of creating a complete record for appellate review.
Blank v. Independent School District No. 16 393 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1986
Blank v. Independent School District No. 16 393 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1986
See Krug v. Independent School District No. 16
In Re the Proposed Placement on Unrequested Leave of Absence of Meyer 381 N.W.2d 476 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Proposed Placement on Unrequested Leave of Absence of Meyer 381 N.W.2d 476 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Petitioners argue that their case is like that of Krug v. Independent School District No. 16
Brandhorst v. Special School District No. 1 365 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Brandhorst v. Special School District No. 1 365 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See id.; Krug v. Independent School District No. 16, (seniority rights override administrative distinction between public health nurse and school nurse); Roseville Education Association v. Independent School District No. 623, (seniority rights override administration distinction between deans and teachers).
Zontelli & Sons, Inc. v. City of Nashwauk 353 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Zontelli & Sons, Inc. v. City of Nashwauk 353 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Addressing the timeliness of an appeal from a modified judgment, our Supreme Court has said: “ ‘[T]he time to appeal an issue begins to run anew from a modification of judgment when the issue was for some reason not appealable before the *604 modification.’ ” Krug v. Independent School District No. 16, (quoting E.C.I.
Marriage of Swartwoudt v. Swartwoudt 349 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Swartwoudt v. Swartwoudt 349 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
No. 16, the trial court denied a motion for amended findings and a new trial, but issued an addendum to its original order.
Marriage of Servin v. Servin 345 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1984
Marriage of Servin v. Servin 345 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1984

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by