Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Leininger v. City of Bloomington, 299 N.W.2d 723.

39 citing documents.

City of Saint Paul v. Eldredge 800 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 2011
Bolden v. Hennepin County Board of Commissioners 504 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Bolden v. Hennepin County Board of Commissioners 504 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(remanding to Veteran’s Preference Board for findings regarding back pay “to enable the Merit Board to act *278 on the compensation question”).
Anderson v. City of Minneapolis 493 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Anderson v. City of Minneapolis 493 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Caldwell v. City of Minneapolis 486 N.W.2d 151 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Caldwell v. City of Minneapolis 486 N.W.2d 151 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re the Proposed Discharge of Larkin 415 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Proposed Discharge of Larkin 415 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(quoting respectively State ex rel.
Walters v. Ramsey County 410 N.W.2d 343 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Walters v. Ramsey County 410 N.W.2d 343 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Myers v. City of Oakdale 409 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 1987
Myers v. City of Oakdale 409 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 1987
Bush v. City of St. Joseph 395 N.W.2d 466 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bush v. City of St. Joseph 395 N.W.2d 466 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. Schrader 394 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 1986
Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. Schrader 394 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 1986
This court first had an opportunity to address the question of the scope of power of a
Gruening v. Pinotti 392 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Gruening v. Pinotti 392 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
City of Thief River Falls v. Melbye 391 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
City of Thief River Falls v. Melbye 391 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
the Minnesota Supreme Court described the standard applicable to an appellate court’s review of municipal employee dismissal hearings as follows: Where proceedings before the administrative agency vested with final authority are instituted upon a notice which reasonably details the facts claimed to consti
Ramsey County Community Human Services Department v. Davila 387 N.W.2d 421 Minn. 1986
Ramsey County Community Human Services Department v. Davila 387 N.W.2d 421 Minn. 1986
we construed this provision of the Act, noting that a section of the Bloomington Home Rule Charter and Merit System Rules conflicted with a state civil service rule, Minn.Stat.
Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. Schrader 380 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. Schrader 380 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The district court found that there was substantial evidence to support the board’s finding that Schrader’s admitted conduct toward Land-wehr constituted misconduct under the Veterans Preference Act, but remanded the case to the hearing board to clarify “what extenuating circumstances it relied upon in its election to fashion a new remedy” ().
Davila v. Ramsey County Community Human Services Department 374 N.W.2d 547 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Davila v. Ramsey County Community Human Services Department 374 N.W.2d 547 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
involved the authority of a merit board to modify discipline of a veteran.
Thompson v. City of Appleton 366 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Thompson v. City of Appleton 366 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
§ 44.08 (1984), which provides that a permanent employee shall not be dismissed “except for just cause.” -64 (Minn.1982)
AFSCME Council 96 v. Arrowhead Regional Corrections Board 356 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1984
AFSCME Council 96 v. Arrowhead Regional Corrections Board 356 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1984
the court held that neither the City of Bloomington’s Home Rule Charter, nor anything in section 197.46 contemplate that the Veteran’s Preference Hearing Board serve merely as a body that reviews findings and approves or disapproves recommendations, but that its function is also to decide for itself what
In Re Arbitration County of Cass & Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. 353 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re Arbitration County of Cass & Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. 353 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Mitlyng v. Wolff 342 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 1984
Mitlyng v. Wolff 342 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 1984
General Drivers, Local 346 v. Aitkin County Board 320 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1982
General Drivers, Local 346 v. Aitkin County Board 320 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1982
Thompson v. City of Minneapolis 300 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 1980
Thompson v. City of Minneapolis 300 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 1980
616, 620 , 17 L.Ed.2d 562 (1967)