Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite McCannel v. County of Hennepin, 301 N.W.2d 910.

110 citing documents.

  • Hegenes v. State 328 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1983
  • Hegenes v. State 328 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1983
    Since our state’s uni *721 formity clause is no more restrictive than the federal clause, , 916 n. 4 (Minn.1980), we shall discuss the two clauses together.
  • United States Steel Corp. v. State 324 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1982
  • United States Steel Corp. v. State 324 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1982
    (Minn.1978) -19 (Minn.1980) where we reiterated that the legislature must be allowed to develop solutions to social problems free from undue restraints by the courts; that the courts will not disturb a legislative determination unless the classification is clearly arbitrary and has no reasonable basis; that states are not bou
  • Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis v. State 313 N.W.2d 619 Minn. 1981
  • Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis v. State 313 N.W.2d 619 Minn. 1981
    Because the building is specially adapted to a unique use and will not readily be sold to another user, “[t]he very nature of special purpose property is such that market value cannot readily be determined by the existence of an actual market, and therefore other methods of valuation, such as reproduction cost, must be resorted to.”
  • Anacker v. County of Cottonwood 302 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 1981
  • Anacker v. County of Cottonwood 302 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 1981
    at -,-(Minn.1980) filed September 5, 1980, si.
  • Guilliams v. Commissioner of Revenue 299 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 1980
  • Guilliams v. Commissioner of Revenue 299 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 1980
    Our recent case of holds the tax court, as essentially an administrative agency, has jurisdiction to determine the constitutionality of tax statutes when, in the first instance the constitutional issue is raised in the district court before the case is transferred to the tax court.