50541 Precedential Affirmed Processed

State v. Vangstad

Minnesota Supreme Court · Filed November 16, 1979 · 289 N.W.2d 468

Cited by

State v. Pelovsky 347 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 1984

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

State v. Sickels 275 N.W.2d 809
State v. Linder 268 N.W.2d 734
State v. Webber 262 N.W.2d 157

Opinion text

SHERAN, Chief Justice. This is a pretrial appeal by the state pursuant to R. 29.03, subd. 1, R.Crim.P., from an order of the district court granting a motion by defendant to suppress two statements made by defendant. The district court ruled that the state had failed to meet its burden of proving the first statement was voluntary or the second statement free from the taint of the earlier statement. North Carolina v. Butler, 441 U.S. 369 , 99 S.Ct. 1755 , 60 L.Ed.2d 286 , (1979); Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975); State v. Sickels, 275 N.W.2d 809 (Minn.1979); State v. Linder, 268 N.W.2d 734 (Minn.1978). Holding that the state on appeal has not met its burden of demonstrating error, we affirm. State v. Weber, 262 N.W.2d 157 (Minn.1977). Affirmed.