Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Elzie v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 298 N.W.2d 29.
- MNVA Railroad v. John Alden Life Insurance Co. 507 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Matter of Welfare of DSS 506 N.W.2d 650 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Matter of Welfare of DSS 506 N.W.2d 650 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Geldert v. American National Bank 506 N.W.2d 22 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Geldert v. American National Bank 506 N.W.2d 22 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Davis v. State, Department of Corrections 500 N.W.2d 134 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Davis v. State, Department of Corrections 500 N.W.2d 134 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- LeBaron v. Minnesota Board of Public Defense 499 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
LeBaron v. Minnesota Board of Public Defense
499 N.W.2d 39
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Safety, (describing limited function of a motion to dismiss).
- Gertken v. State 493 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Gertken v. State 493 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Kryzer v. Champlin American Legion No. 600 481 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Kryzer v. Champlin American Legion No. 600 481 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Ludowese v. Redmann 479 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Ludowese v. Redmann 479 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Schocker v. State, Department of Human Rights 477 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Schocker v. State, Department of Human Rights 477 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Nichols v. Metropolitan Bank 468 N.W.2d 84 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Nichols v. Metropolitan Bank 468 N.W.2d 84 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Carlson v. Estes 458 N.W.2d 123 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-
Carlson v. Estes
458 N.W.2d 123
Minn. Ct. App. 1990
(quoting Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288, 290 , ).
- Federated Mutual Insurance Co. v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc. 456 N.W.2d 434 Minn. 1990
-
Federated Mutual Insurance Co. v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc.
456 N.W.2d 434
Minn. 1990
We also employ the following standards of review regarding the trial court’s order denying appellants’ motions: “whether the complaint sets forth a legally sufficient claim for relief,” (motion to dismiss), and “whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the trial court erred in its application of the law,” (summary judgment).
- Foley v. WCCO Television, Inc. 449 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Foley v. WCCO Television, Inc. 449 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Matter of Schmidt 443 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1989
-
Matter of Schmidt
443 N.W.2d 824
Minn. 1989
Davis v. Davis, 297 Minn. 187, 188 , , 223 n. 1 (1973).
- McIntosh v. Davis 441 N.W.2d 115 Minn. 1989
- McIntosh v. Davis 441 N.W.2d 115 Minn. 1989
- Weber v. Albrecht 437 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Weber v. Albrecht 437 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Schuler v. Meschke 435 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Schuler v. Meschke 435 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Searles v. Searles 412 N.W.2d 11 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Searles v. Searles 412 N.W.2d 11 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Hurley v. TCF Banking & Savings, F.A. 414 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Anderson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 414 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Anderson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 414 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Hurley v. TCF Banking & Savings, F.A. 414 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Mendota Heights Associates v. Friel 414 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Mendota Heights Associates v. Friel 414 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- In Re the Contested Case of Emmanuel Nursing Home 411 N.W.2d 511 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
In Re the Contested Case of Emmanuel Nursing Home
411 N.W.2d 511
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In ruling on whether or not relator Emmanuel Nursing Home’s appeal should be dismissed, the trial court found that “[bjecause matters outside the pleadings have been presented and not excluded, the Department’s motion must be treated as a motion for summary judgment.”
- Lyman Lumber Co. v. Dior Development, Inc. 409 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Walz v. Walz 409 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Lyman Lumber Co. v. Dior Development, Inc. 409 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Walz v. Walz
409 N.W.2d 39
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(citing Klaus v. Minnesota State Ethics Commission, 309 Minn. 430, 434 , ).
- Diedrich v. State 393 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Diedrich v. State
393 N.W.2d 677
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(citing Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288, 290 , ).
- Nelson v. Production Credit Ass'n of Worthington 382 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 1986