Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lunning v. Land O'Lakes, 303 N.W.2d 452.

35 citing documents.

Steven D. Woodke, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Margaret Burrell Hall, successor in interest to Robert L. Hall, decedent v. Barbara Jeanne Hall f/k/a Barbara Jeanne … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Margaret Burrell Hall, successor in interest to Robert L. Hall, decedent v. Barbara Jeanne Hall f/k/a Barbara Jeanne … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
SN4, LLC v. Anchor Bank, FSB, (citing Lunning v. Land O’Lakes, ), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Samuel Deweese, (A13-2152), (A13-2160) v. Lakeview Clinic, Ltd., (A13-2152), (A13-2160). Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Samuel Deweese, (A13-2152), (A13-2160) v. Lakeview Clinic, Ltd., (A13-2152), (A13-2160). Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“The mere threat to withhold from a party a legal right, which he has an adequate remedy to enforce, is not, in the eye of the law, duress; certainly not such as will avoid the execution of a contract.” Lunning v. Land O’Lakes, (quotation omitted).
Capital Midwest Fund, LP v. Douglas E. Johnson, Steven Quay Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Capital Midwest Fund, LP v. Douglas E. Johnson, Steven Quay Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See id.; see also Lunning v. Land O’Lakes, (stating that the only exception permitting a promissory-estoppel claim when a written contract exists is for a promise to reduce a contract to writing).
SN4, LLC v. Anchor Bank, FSB 848 N.W.2d 559 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
SN4, LLC v. Anchor Bank, FSB 848 N.W.2d 559 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“[T]he doctrine of equitable estoppel may limit the application of the [s]tatute of [fjrauds.” Lunning v. Land O’Lakes
Glacial Plains Cooperative v. Lindgren 759 N.W.2d 661 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Glacial Plains Cooperative v. Lindgren 759 N.W.2d 661 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
See Lunning v. Land O’Lakes, (concluding when application of statute of frauds will protect, rather than prevent, fraud, equity requires that doctrine of equitable estoppel be applied); Doyle v. Wohlrabe, 243 Minn. 107 , (stating that basic purpose of statute of frauds is to provide reasonable safeguards
Brekke v. THM Biomedical, Inc. 683 N.W.2d 771 Minn. 2004
Brekke v. THM Biomedical, Inc. 683 N.W.2d 771 Minn. 2004
Lunning v. Land 0’Lakes, (omission in original) (quoting 3 J. Pomeroy, A Treatise on Equity Jurisprudence § 805 (5th ed.1941)).
Rhee v. Golden Home Builders, Inc. 617 N.W.2d 618 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Rhee v. Golden Home Builders, Inc. 617 N.W.2d 618 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Lunning v. Land O’Lakes, (emphasis and quotation omitted).
Sieve v. Rosar 613 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Sieve v. Rosar 613 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Lunning v. Land O’Lakes, (emphasis added) *795 (quotation omitted); see also Thorson v. Rice County Dist.
Marriage of Gully v. Gully 599 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 1999
Marriage of Gully v. Gully 599 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 1999
A misrepresentation is material when it “relates to a matter upon which a plaintiff could be expected to rely in determining whether to engage in the conduct in question.” Black’s Law Dictionary 977 (6th ed.1990); see also Lunning v. Land O’Lakes, (stating that in the context of equitable estoppel for breach of contract “[a] fact is material if it is germane to the unconscionable conduct alleged and works a prejudice to the party”); Preferred Risk Mutual Ins.
CONDEMNATION BY HOUS. & REDEV. v. Suh 553 N.W.2d 115 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
CONDEMNATION BY HOUS. & REDEV. v. Suh 553 N.W.2d 115 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Olson v. Ronhovde 446 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Olson v. Ronhovde 446 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Lunning v. Land O’Lakes, (emphasis in original) (iquoting 3 J. Pomeroy, A Treatise on Equity Jurisprudence § 805 (5th ed. 1941)).
Schaefer v. Bork 413 N.W.2d 873 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Schaefer v. Bork 413 N.W.2d 873 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Lunning v. Land O’Lakes, (“When an application of the Statute will protect, rather than prevent, a fraud, equity requires that the doctrine of equitable estoppel be applied”).
Gould v. Johnson 379 N.W.2d 643 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Gould v. Johnson 379 N.W.2d 643 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Dain Bosworth Inc. v. Goetze 374 N.W.2d 467 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Dain Bosworth Inc. v. Goetze 374 N.W.2d 467 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Lunning v. Land O’Lakes, the Minnesota Supreme Court enumerated the elements of equitable estoppel: 1.
Sievert v. LaMarca 367 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Sievert v. LaMarca 367 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
MTS CO. v. Taiga Corp. 365 N.W.2d 321 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
MTS CO. v. Taiga Corp. 365 N.W.2d 321 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Nelson v. Smith 349 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Nelson v. Smith 349 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Lunning v. Land O’Lakes, (emphasis omitted), quoting, 3 J. Pomeroy, A Treatise on Equity Jurisprudence § 805 (5th ed. 1941).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by