Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Wright v. Wright, 311 N.W.2d 484.

22 citing documents.

In re the Estate of: Jose Antonio Chimborazò Quizhpi, decedent. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See, d 335, 339 (Minn. App. 2006) (noting that “[a] constructive trust is a ‘judicially created equitable remedy imposed to prevent unjust enrichment of a person holding property under a duty to convey it or use it for a specific purpose.’” (d 484, 485 (Minn. 1981)).
The CastleRock Group, LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
James C. Holmes, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A constructive trust is a judicially created equitable remedy to prevent unjust enrichment, and the Minnesota Supreme Court has held that it is an appropriate remedy when “legal title to property is obtained through fraud, oppression, duress, undue influence, force, crime, or similar means.”
Mark W. Tibbals v. Kerry G. Tibbals Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Mark W. Tibbals v. Kerry G. Tibbals Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Marriage of Danielson v. Danielson 721 N.W.2d 335 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Marriage of Danielson v. Danielson 721 N.W.2d 335 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Appellant also argues that the district court’s “imposition” of what appellant characterizes as “a constructive trust” in favor of the nonparty Danielson “was improper.” A constructive trust is a “judicially created equitable remedy imposed to prevent unjust enrichment of a person holding property under a duty to convey it or use it for a specific purpose.”
Shepherd of the Valley Lutheran Church of Hastings v. Hope Lutheran Church of Hastings 626 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Shepherd of the Valley Lutheran Church of Hastings v. Hope Lutheran Church of Hastings 626 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(holding that if legal title to property is obtained through a breach of fiduciary relationship, a constructive trust arises in favor of the person equitably entitled to the property).
PJ Acquisition Corp. v. Skoglund 453 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1990
Estate of Jones Ex Rel. Blume v. Kvamme 449 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 1989
Estate of Jones Ex Rel. Blume v. Kvamme 449 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 1989
Blumberg v. Taggart, 213 Minn. 39, 43
Bly v. Gensmer 386 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bly v. Gensmer 386 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
A constructive trust will arise “whenever the legal title to property is obtained through fraud, oppression, duress, undue influence, force, crime, or similar means, or by taking improper advantage of a confidential or fiduciary relationship * * (citations omitted).
Matter of Estate of Kroyer 385 N.W.2d 31 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Matter of Estate of Kroyer 385 N.W.2d 31 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Arnold v. Smith, 121 Minn. 116, 129 , 140 N.W.
Fredin v. Farmers State Bank of Mountain Lake 384 N.W.2d 532 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Fredin v. Farmers State Bank of Mountain Lake 384 N.W.2d 532 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Ferguson v. Shea 374 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Ferguson v. Shea 374 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
“[A] constructive trust is a judicially created equitable remedy imposed to prevent unjust enrichment of ’ a person holding property under a duty to convey it or use it for a specific purpose.”
Mjolsness v. Mjolsness 363 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Mjolsness v. Mjolsness 363 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Constructive Trusts “[A] constructive trust is a judicially created equitable remedy imposed to prevent unjust enrichment of a person holding property under a duty to convey it or use it for a specific purpose.” (citing Koberg v. Jones, 279 Minn. 406 , ).