Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Holiday Acres No. 3 v. Midwest Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, 308 N.W.2d 471.

22 citing documents.

Skyler Woodard, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
& Loan Ass’n of Minneapolis , and Karim v. Werner
Esplendido Apartments v. Metropolitan Condominium Ass'n 778 P.2d 1221 Ariz. 1989
Hesselgrave v. Harrison 435 N.W.2d 861 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Hesselgrave v. Harrison 435 N.W.2d 861 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Holiday Acres No. 3 v. Midwest Federal Savings & Loan Association of Minneapolis
Snow v. Western Savings & Loan Ass'n 730 P.2d 204 Ariz. 1987
Norwest Bank East St. Paul v. Larson 380 N.W.2d 586 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
French v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 372 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
French v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 372 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
56.03; Holiday Acres No. 3 v. Midwest Federal Savings and Loan Assoc., Ahlm v. Rooney, 274 Minn. 259
Lyons v. State Ex Rel. Humphrey Ex Rel. Pung 366 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Lyons v. State Ex Rel. Humphrey Ex Rel. Pung 366 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Holiday Acres No. 3 v. Midwest Federal Savings & Loan Association
Hunt v. IBM Mid America Employees Federal Credit Union 358 N.W.2d 461 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hunt v. IBM Mid America Employees Federal Credit Union 358 N.W.2d 461 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Holiday Acres No. 3 v. Midwest Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n of Minneapolis
Viereck v. Peoples Savings & Loan Ass'n 343 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1984
Viereck v. Peoples Savings & Loan Ass'n 343 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1984
Holiday Acres No. 3 v. Midwest Federal Savings and Loan Association, Torgerson-Forstrom H.I.
Torgerson-Forstrom H.I. of Willmar, Inc. v. Olmsted Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 339 N.W.2d 901 Minn. 1983
Torgerson-Forstrom H.I. of Willmar, Inc. v. Olmsted Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 339 N.W.2d 901 Minn. 1983
Suffice it to say here that in Holiday Acres No. 3 v. Midwest Federal Savings and Loan Association of Minneapolis, this court held that the enforcement of a due-on-sale clause by a mortgagee, which declined to waive its right to accelerate payment of the loan and required the purchaser to refinance at a higher rate of interest, was not per se unreasonable even though the clause was no doubt originally inserted to insu
Karim v. Werner 333 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1983
Karim v. Werner 333 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1983
This view comports with Holiday Acres No. 3 v. Midwest Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n of Minneapolis, 1 where we held that a due-on-sale clause contained in a mortgage agreement did not constitute an unlawful restraint upon the alienation of the residential investment property at issue.
Hoeg v. Twin City Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 324 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1982
Hoeg v. Twin City Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 324 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1982
The trial court, relying on our decision in Holiday Acres No. 3 v. Midwest Federal Savings & Loan Association of Minneapolis, properly concluded that the due on sale clause was unenforceable.
Gate Co. v. Midwest Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 324 N.W.2d 202 Minn. 1982
Gate Co. v. Midwest Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 324 N.W.2d 202 Minn. 1982
The trial court, relying on our holding in Holiday Acres No. 3 v. Midwest Federal Savings & Loan Association, concluded that TCF had no right to enforce the clause because Minnesota law prohibits the exercise of such clauses in mortgages covering owner-occupied residential property.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by