Page v. Blake
The holding in the court’s own words
We hold that the finding as to damages and the finding as to permanency are irreconcilable.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Cited by
- Sievert v. First National Bank in Lakefield 358 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Carufel v. Steven 293 N.W.2d 47
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial or judgment n.o.v. The trial court adopted the jury’s findings: 1) that defendant was negligent in the operation of a vehicle in which plaintiff was a passenger; 2) that plaintiff’s damages amounted to $31,250; and 3) that plaintiff was not permanently injured. We hold that the finding as to damages and the finding as to permanency are irreconcilable. Carufel v. Steven, 293 N.W.2d 47 (Minn.1980). Accordingly we reverse and remand for a new trial on those issues only. Reversed.