Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ridgewood Development Co. v. State, 294 N.W.2d 288.

97 citing documents.

Stoebe v. Merastar Insurance Co. 554 N.W.2d 733 Minn. 1996
Stoebe v. Merastar Insurance Co. 554 N.W.2d 733 Minn. 1996
Stillwater Township v. Rivard 547 N.W.2d 906 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Stillwater Township v. Rivard 547 N.W.2d 906 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Holmberg 545 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Holmberg 545 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minneapolis v. City of Lakeville 532 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minneapolis v. City of Lakeville 532 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
(quoting Yaeger v. Delano Granite Works, 250 Minn. 303, 307 , ).
ServiceMaster of St. Cloud v. GAB Business Services, Inc. 530 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
ServiceMaster of St. Cloud v. GAB Business Services, Inc. 530 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
NBZ Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Shakopee 489 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
NBZ Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Shakopee 489 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
(to establish equitable estoppel, plaintiff must show reliance induced by some language or conduct by defendant, which reliance is to plaintiffs injury, detriment, or prejudice).
Stotts v. Wright County 478 N.W.2d 802 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Stotts v. Wright County 478 N.W.2d 802 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Andrews v. Benson 476 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Andrews v. Benson 476 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Rose Cliff Landscape Nursery, Inc. v. City of Rosemount 467 N.W.2d 641 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Rose Cliff Landscape Nursery, Inc. v. City of Rosemount 467 N.W.2d 641 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Rice Street VFW, Post 3877 v. City of St. Paul 452 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Rice Street VFW, Post 3877 v. City of St. Paul 452 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Anderson v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. 443 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Anderson v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. 443 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
This is fatal to North River’s argument as *549 “inducement is central to the concept of equitable estoppel.”
Matter of Westling Mfg., Inc. 442 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Matter of Westling Mfg., Inc. 442 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
(emphasis added) (-93 (Minn.1980)).
Department of Human Services v. Muriel Humphrey Residences 436 N.W.2d 110 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Department of Human Services v. Muriel Humphrey Residences 436 N.W.2d 110 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
While a plaintiff seeking to es-top a government agency has a heavy burden of proof, one type of estoppel claim does not require such a restrictive application of estoppel.
Dege v. City of Maplewood 416 N.W.2d 854 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Dege v. City of Maplewood 416 N.W.2d 854 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State, City of Eden Prairie v. Liepke 403 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State, City of Eden Prairie v. Liepke 403 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Haugen v. Peterson 400 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1987
Haugen v. Peterson 400 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1987
A definition of what constitutes a “vested right”
Laue v. Production Credit Ass'n of Blooming Prairie 390 N.W.2d 823 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Rockville Township v. Lang 387 N.W.2d 200 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Rockville Township v. Lang 387 N.W.2d 200 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(emphasis in original) (quoting Heeter, Zoning Estoppel: Application of the Principles of Equitable Estoppel and Vested Rights to Zoning Disputes, 1971 Urb.L.Ann.
Brown v. Minnesota Department of Public Welfare 368 N.W.2d 906 Minn. 1985
Brown v. Minnesota Department of Public Welfare 368 N.W.2d 906 Minn. 1985
Appeal of Kenney 358 N.W.2d 120 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Appeal of Kenney 358 N.W.2d 120 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Contested Case of Brown v. Minnesota Department of Public Welfare 354 N.W.2d 115 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Contested Case of Brown v. Minnesota Department of Public Welfare 354 N.W.2d 115 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Beaty v. Minnesota Board of Teaching 354 N.W.2d 466 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Beaty v. Minnesota Board of Teaching 354 N.W.2d 466 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Jasaka Co. v. City of St. Paul 309 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1981
Followed Jasaka Co. v. City of St. Paul 309 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1981
and Hawkinson v. County of Itasca, 304 Minn. 367
Town Board of Marshan v. City Council of Hastings 298 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1980
Town Board of Marshan v. City Council of Hastings 298 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1980